On 3/10/24 22:28, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 3/10/24 21:48, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I doubt the bug report will come up with anything since this is
something very specific to your system. Do you have any packages from
fc37? Do you have any locked packages? Have you installed any
self-built packages?
You didn't answer these questions.
Does "rpm -qf /lib64/*\.so* | grep owned" give you anything?
Mine only shows "p11-kit-trust.so".
rpm -qf /lib64/*\.so* | grep owned
file /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libavahi-gobject.so.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libavahi-gobject.so.0.0.5 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libFAudio.so.0.22.10 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libfreeaptx.so.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libfreeaptx.so.0.1.1 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libfzclient-commonui-private-3.66.0.so is not owned by any
package
file /lib64/libfzclient-private-3.66.0.so is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libgdal.so.33.3.7.2 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libgovirt.so.2 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libgovirt.so.2.3.1 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libhpdiscovery.so.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libhpdiscovery.so.0.0.1 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libhpipp.so.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libhpipp.so.0.0.1 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libhpip.so.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libhpip.so.0.0.1 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libhpmud.so.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libhpmud.so.0.0.6 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libnetsnmp.so.40.1.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libopenfec.so.1 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libopenfec.so.1.4.2 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libopensc.so.8 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libopensc.so.8.0.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libpipewire-0.3.so.0.361.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libpipewire-0.3.so.0.372.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libroc.so.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libroc.so.0.2 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libSDL2_image-2.0.so.0.600.1 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libsmm-local.so.8 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/libsmm-local.so.8.0.0 is not owned by any package
file /lib64/onepin-opensc-pkcs11.so is not owned by any package
file /lib64/opensc-pkcs11.so is not owned by any package
file /lib64/p11-kit-trust.so is not owned by any package
file /lib64/pkcs11-spy.so is not owned by any package
You probably need to get rid of these. Check the dates on the files with:
ls -l $(rpm -qf /lib64/*\.so* | grep owned | cut -d' ' -f2)
What does "ldd /bin/marble | grep libicu" show?
# ldd /bin/marble | grep libic
libicui18n.so.73 => /lib64/libicui18n.so.73 (0x00007fdf39600000)
libicuuc.so.73 => /lib64/libicuuc.so.73 (0x00007fdf39200000)
libicudata.so.73 => /lib64/libicudata.so.73 (0x00007fdf2e000000)
libicui18n.so.69 => not found
libicuuc.so.69 => not found
libicudata.so.69 => not found
Ok, then show the whole output of "ldd /bin/marble".
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
