Todd Zullinger writes:
> So, can anyone tell me why %{_includedir}/ltdl.h, which is > /usr/include/ltdl.h, got rejected by mock+dnf5, but %{__make}, which is > /usr/bin/make was just peachy?Using file or directory paths in requires is only allowed for /usr/bin /usr/sbin, and /etc, per the packaging guidelines¹. I didn't dig through the dnf5 changes for a link, but I believe that it doesn't support such out-of-scope path dependencies like /usr/include.
The odd thing is that dnf5 repoquery works for any path. I just checked, and it told me which package provides /usr/include/ltdl.h
This may very well be a packaging guideline for Fedora, but I would think that rmplint would be the one complaining. mock must be attempting to resolve this dependency on its own, because if it's up to dnf5 it wouldn't have any problems with it. I wonder what rpmbuild in F40 will say, here…
pgpcyH7EjaPSH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
