On 10/22/24 2:46 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/22/24 02:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/22/24 2:25 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/22/24 02:22, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/22/24 2:04 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
What replaces --skip-broken in dnf5?
# dnf --releasever=40 --skip-broken upgrade
Unknown argument "--skip-broken" for command "dnf5". Add "--help"
for more information about the arguments.
How did you end up with dnf5? That might explain some of your issues.
I presume it was part of the upgrade to 40
# rpm -qa dnf
dnf-4.21.1-1.fc39.noarch
# which dnf
/usr/bin/dnf
# ls -al /usr/bin/dnf
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 4 Sep 19 17:00 /usr/bin/dnf -> dnf5
Maybe it was the failed upgrade to 41.
Most probably!
I'm on 40 and have this:
# rpm -q dnf
dnf-4.21.1-1.fc40.noarch
# ls -l /usr/bin/dnf
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 5 Aug 14 17:00 /usr/bin/dnf -> dnf-3
What does "rpm -qf /usr/bin/dnf5" give you?
# rpm -qf /usr/bin/dnf5
file /usr/bin/dnf5 is not owned by any package
Something is really broken now. I highly recommend a re-install at this
point or when you decide to go to F41. I wouldn't trust any of the
system files to be what they should be.
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
