On 11/11/24 11:01, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Am I doing something wrong then when I did not have to do any cleanup for the system to be in this state? As a side issue, I might be treading on thin ice here, I have never done any of the post-install processes on any version of Fedora. Until I saw references to them in this list when I was on F39, I didn't know they existed to even go looking for them. I did one try dnf autoremove and that wanted to remove half my system, so I abandoned that process, and issuing it now wants to remove 299 packages, some of which look to be old from their names, but how do I know whether they are actually redundant or whether I am using something from them. For example, it wants to remove package f36-backgrounds-gnome, how do I know whether I am using a background from that package hence should not be removed?On 11/10/24 13:46, Stephen Morris wrote:On my F41 system upgraded from F40, it is using /etc/redhat-release to store its release version which for me contains Fedora release 41 (Forty One) and /usr/share/fedora/fedora-release-common contains nothing but a legal txt file and a license file, there is no fedora sub-folder of licenses.Note: dnf dose not use /etc/redhat-release as it release version. It uses /usr/share/licenses/fedora/fedora-release-common*Command "rpm -qa /*fedora-release-common/*" produces nothing.After I got it all cleaned up, I did not have them either.
regards, Steve
OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0F7242C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
