On 25/11/24 10:13, Barry wrote:
Yes, I believe they were both issued under sudo, but I'll double check that next time.On 24 Nov 2024, at 21:54, Stephen Morris<[email protected]> wrote: I've been in the situation where running a dnf check-upgrade has refreshed the two Fedora Updates repositories and then issued dnf upgrade immediately after and had it refresh the two updates repositories again. I've been told from this mail list that for the Updates repositories that is normal as they are being updated all the time.Did you do both dnf commands with sudo? If dnf check-update was not run under sudo then the metadata is saved somewhere is you user’s $HOME. Then when you run sudo dnf update it will not have access to the user’s copy of the meta data.
regards, Steve
Barry
OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0F7242C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
