On Sun Jun15'25 09:15:10PM, Marco Moock wrote:
> From: Marco Moock <m...@dorfdsl.de>
> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 21:15:10 +0200
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: is there a way to disable dnf from ignoring conflicting
> requests
>
> Am 15.06.2025 um 13:51:35 Uhr schrieb Ranjan Maitra via users:
>
> > $ sudo dnf install ../RPMS/x86_64/gbuffy-0.2.8-3.fc42.x86_64.rpm
> > Updating and loading repositories:
> > Repositories loaded.
> > Failed to resolve the transaction:
> > Problem: conflicting requests
> > - nothing provides libcrypto.so.1.1()(64bit) needed by
> > gbuffy-0.2.8-3.fc42.x86_64 from @commandline
> > - nothing provides libssl.so.1.1()(64bit) needed by
> > gbuffy-0.2.8-3.fc42.x86_64 from @commandline
> > - nothing provides libssl.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit) needed by
> > gbuffy-0.2.8-3.fc42.x86_64 from @commandline You can try to add to
> > command line: --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages
> >
> > I do not understand what the issue is. The spec file explicitly
> > disables openssl and does not even require it.
>
> Do the binaries link against those files?
> If so, you need to check the compilation of them.
Thanks very much! Yes, interestingly it does:
$ ldd gbuffy
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007f3f7a937000)
libgtk-1.2.so.0 => /lib64/libgtk-1.2.so.0 (0x00007f3f7a7a2000)
libgdk-1.2.so.0 => /lib64/libgdk-1.2.so.0 (0x00007f3f7a75c000)
libgmodule-1.2.so.0 => /lib64/libgmodule-1.2.so.0 (0x00007f3f7a756000)
libglib-1.2.so.0 => /lib64/libglib-1.2.so.0 (0x00007f3f7a725000)
libXi.so.6 => /lib64/libXi.so.6 (0x00007f3f7a711000)
libXext.so.6 => /lib64/libXext.so.6 (0x00007f3f7a6fd000)
libX11.so.6 => /lib64/libX11.so.6 (0x00007f3f7a5b5000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f3f7a4c7000)
libPropList.so.0 => /lib64/libPropList.so.0 (0x00007f3f7a4b7000)
libssl.so.3 => /lib64/libssl.so.3 (0x00007f3f7a3e1000)
libcrypto.so.3 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.3 (0x00007f3f79e00000)
libcompface.so.1 => /lib64/libcompface.so.1 (0x00007f3f7a3ce000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f3f79c0e000)
libxcb.so.1 => /lib64/libxcb.so.1 (0x00007f3f7a3a2000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f3f7a939000)
libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007f3f7a37f000)
libXau.so.6 => /lib64/libXau.so.6 (0x00007f3f7a379000)
BUt I wonder where this different version comes in? Can I specify the updated
ssl version through the spec file or something else?
Many thanks,
Ranjan
>
> --
> Gruß
> Marco
>
> Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1749988295mu...@cartoonies.org
> --
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
