On 08/20/2010 12:16 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/17/2010 09:50 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: >> >> I did that yesterday. No new SPAM markings on my hourly emails, though >> some of my other admin emails are now getting marked as [SPAM], like a >> couple of denyhosts reports. One of them had a -2.6 SPAM level.... > > I suppose you could post those headers as well, so we could offer > further advise.
OK, I have been playing with whitelist_from_rcvd trying to get this one right as well, but for now, here is the last Denyhosts report I got that was marked as [SPAM]. > Return-Path: <nob...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on > kjc386.framingham.ma.us > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, > SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 > Received-SPF: pass (kjc386.framingham.ma.us: domain of nob...@localhost > designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=kjc386.framingham.ma.us; > client-ip=127.0.0.1; helo=kjc386.framingham.ma.us; > envelope-from=nob...@localhost; x-software=spfmilter 0.97 > http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.0.0; > X-Virus-Status: Clean > X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at kjc386.framingham.ma.us > Received: from kjc386.framingham.ma.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by kjc386.framingham.ma.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7JGobga013007 > for <root>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:50:37 -0400 > Message-Id: <201008191650.o7jgobga013...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us> > From: DenyHosts <nob...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us> > To: r...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us > Subject: [SPAM] DenyHosts Report from kjc386.framingham.ma.us > Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:50:37 -0400 > X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 > (kjc386.framingham.ma.us [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:50:37 -0400 (EDT) SCORE=-102.9 USER_IN_WHITELIST and yet the subject line was re-written with [SPAM] In case it matters, here is the /var/log/maillog of the entire processing of the message: > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 milter-greylist: smfi_getsymval failed for > {daemon_port}, using default smtp port > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 milter-greylist: o7JGobga013007: skipping greylist > because address 127.0.0.1 is whitelisted, (from=<nob...@localhost>, > rcpt=<root>, addr=localhost[127.0.0.1]) ACL 158 > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: > from=<nob...@localhost>, size=304, class=0, nrcpts=1, > msgid=<201008191650.o7jgobga013...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us>, proto=ESMTP, > daemon=MTA-v6, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: Milter insert (0): > header: Received-SPF: pass (kjc386.framingham.ma.us: domain of > nob...@localhost designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) > receiver=kjc386.framingham.ma.us; client-ip=127.0.0.1; > helo=kjc386.framingham.ma.us; envelope-from=nob...@localhost; > x-software=spfmilter 0.97 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with > libspf2-1.0.0; > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: Milter add: header: > X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 > (kjc386.framingham.ma.us [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:50:37 -0400 (EDT) > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: Milter insert (1): > header: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at kjc386.framingham.ma.us > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: Milter insert (1): > header: X-Virus-Status: Clean > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 spamd[9721]: spamd: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 40578 > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 spamd[9721]: spamd: setuid to sa-milt succeeded > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 spamd[9721]: spamd: processing message (unknown) for > sa-milt:492 > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 spamd[9721]: spamd: identified spam (6.2/5.0) for > sa-milt:492 in 0.8 seconds, 1139 bytes. > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 spamd[9721]: spamd: result: Y 6 - > ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_99,FH_FROMEML_NOTLD,MISSING_MID,SPF_PASS,TO_MALFORMED > scantime=0.8,size=1139,user=sa-milt,uid=492,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=40578,mid=(unknown),bayes=1.000000,autolearn=no > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: Milter add: header: > X-Spam-Flag: YES > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: Milter add: header: > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.2 required=5.0 > tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_99,\n\tFH_FROMEML_NOTLD,MISSING_MID,SPF_PASS,TO_MALFORMED > autolearn=no version=3.3.1 > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: Milter add: header: > X-Spam-Report: \n\t* -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via > SMTP\n\t* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%\n\t* > [score: 1.0000]\n\t* 2.1 TO_MALFORMED To: has a malformed address\n\t* 1.1 > FH_FROMEML_NOTLD E-mail address doesn't have TLD (.com, etc.)\n\t* -0.0 > SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record\n\t* 0.5 MISSING_MID Missing > Message-Id: header > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: Milter add: header: > X-Spam-Level: ****** > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: Milter add: header: > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) > on\n\tkjc386.framingham.ma.us > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: Milter change: header > Subject: from DenyHosts Report from kjc386.framingham.ma.us to [SPAM] > DenyHosts Report from kjc386.framingham.ma.us > Aug 19 12:50:37 kjc386 sendmail[13007]: o7JGobga013007: Milter message: body > replaced > Aug 19 12:50:38 kjc386 spamd[10563]: spamd: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 40580 > Aug 19 12:50:38 kjc386 spamd[10563]: spamd: setuid to cummings succeeded > Aug 19 12:50:38 kjc386 spamd[10563]: spamd: processing message > <201008191650.o7jgobga013...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us> for cummings:1630 > Aug 19 12:50:38 kjc386 spamd[32460]: prefork: child states: IB > Aug 19 12:50:39 kjc386 spamd[10563]: spamd: clean message (-102.9/4.0) for > cummings:1630 in 1.2 seconds, 1905 bytes. > Aug 19 12:50:39 kjc386 spamd[10563]: spamd: result: . -102 - > ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WHITELIST > scantime=1.2,size=1905,user=cummings,uid=1630,required_score=4.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=40580,mid=<201008191650.o7jgobga013...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us>,bayes=0.000000,autolearn=ham > Aug 19 12:50:39 kjc386 sendmail[13015]: o7JGobga013007: to=cummings, > ctladdr=<nob...@localhost> (99/99), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:02, > mailer=local, pri=31779, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent > Aug 19 12:50:39 kjc386 spamd[32460]: prefork: child states: II It looks like sa-milt is getting a-hold of the message first, and marking it as [SPAM] with a score of 6.2. Then it looks like its getting run again???? Probably my bad configuration, but how can I keep the spamass-milter from marking this kind of email as spam if changing /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf doesn't do it? BTW, my /etc/sysconfig/spamass-milter file uses: > EXTRA_FLAGS="-r 10" so, now I can see how any email marks 10 or greater will be dropped on the floor.... Do I need to add the -m option here as well? -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@rcn.com cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
