On Sunday 30 January 2011 20:10:15 Joe Zeff wrote: > On 01/30/2011 11:49 AM, mike cloaked wrote: > > I don't know if the design of NetworkManager ever considered this > > scenario and whether any developer ever put in place code to hook up > > to a valid strong signal even if a previously valid signal (which is > > currently weaker) still exists - but it seems to me that the decision > > logic in NetworkManager is both perverse and flawed? > > I'm guessing that it's never occurred to the devs that somebody might > set things up like that. You might want to put this on Bugzilla as a > feature request because I doubt that most people would consider it to be > a bug.
Please post the bug number here. I have exactly the same need, and the same problem, so I'll want to subscribe to the bug report. Anne -- New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
