On 11/26/2011 05:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > >> Simple: Packages don't rebuilt unless there is a necessity to do so > > and what about the mass-rebuilds usually happening in devel-cycle > after upgrades of GCC, GLIBC etc.? > > 99% of all packages are rebuilt there > what is with the one percent? > > do they not sucessfully compile? > if yes - why does this nobody interest? > > for me this is a part of QA > and if any package shipped with the distribution does not compile > inside a mass-rebuild there must be something wrong! > Well, some packages do not need to be rebuilt. Things like the noarch packages - shell scripts usually do not need to be changed. Unless there is a major change in Pearl or Python that necessitates changes in the program, packages written those languages are not going to need to be rebuilt. I am sure you can find other examples if you try...
Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
