On 02/06/2013 12:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Here this sounds like you are filing bugs about bugzilla, not about firewalld.
That particular bug was about Bugzilla,yes. I used it because it was fresh in my mind. However, I also have a RFE for Gnucash (at the Gnome Bugzilla) that's gotten the first response from a dev after over a year, and it's basically, "we don't care." I won't say that all RFEs get ignored this way, but judging only from my own experience, it's not exactly uncommon.
It's true that sometimes bugs do get closed in the way you are describing, but it's important to recognize that different components have different owners. And it's also important to note that the in-production bugzilla.redhat.com installation is a particular special case, since it's used by Fedora but is not part of Fedora.
Yes, I understand that, and in fact, there's a special procedure for reporting bugs in Bugzilla itself that I was careful to take. Some of the devs actually care about what the users think and listen to their concerns, both about bugs and enhancements, but many of them either don't or give the appearance of unconcern. With luck, whoever's maintaining firewalld is one of the good ones. We can only hope.
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
