On 24/02/13 09:24, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: >> why? >> >> virtually nobody needs the browser-plugin and if you read >> the security news of the last few months it would be a >> dmaned bad idea to install this crap on every computer >> as dependency because it is a useless security hole I'm sure it does not matter what the middle development platform is - activex, java, flash, javascript, ios, android, etc. If it's actually useful, then the bad boys are going to find a way around it; and that might be a good thing.
If the developers of the platform can't and aren't ensuring their code is security robust, we need other people to be breaking their code so that in the end, we gain more robust platforms... But on the real topic: let's say we asked yum to tell us: yum search: browser: lines=126, it's there java : lines=1374, it's there plugin : lines=1710, not there plug-in: lines=137, present openjdk: lines=10, present. Narrowing down: java plugin: lines=90, not there. makes sense because plugin above browser plugin: lines=11, not there browser java: lines=8, it's there browser openjdk: lines=1. strike. browser java plugin: lines=9. present. browser java plug-in: lines=1. strike java plug-in: lines=3. easy pick What search terms would others have used ? Perhaps we can get the description and/or provides improved in the package ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
