On 01/21/14 22:49, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 21 January 2014 10:07, Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is there some specific reason this needs to be cross-posted to three
>> different lists (none of which is the Testing list)? Presumably those
>> using dnf will get the update anyway.
> It seems to me, Ales is damned if he does publicize the release, and
> damned if he doesn't. Are you people not the same people that were
> demanding exact feature parity before dnf could replace yum? The
> alternative is he doesn't post these messages, you don't engage with
> him and the various other people pushing dnf+hawkey; F22 comes without
> yum and then everyone is angry because they weren't involved earlier.
>
> I don't think one of these mails has actually thanked Ales for working
> on dnf, and from someone who's intimately familiar with the yum
> code-base, you probably should rather than lecture him on mailing list
> etiquette.
>
> Richard

Totally agree.....

It didn't trouble me in the least that the message was posted to multiple 
lists.  

I guess some folks would have been happier if Ales would have sent individual 
messages to each of the mailing lists.

-- 
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to