On 07/02/2015 12:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Rick Stevens <ri...@alldigital.com> wrote:
Simply nulling bytes 510 and 511 of the first sector (getting rid
of the boot signature) should make the BIOS ignore the drive.
That signature applies to the entire MBR, including the partition
scheme. The signature is not a "boot me" signature.
GRUB probably shouldn't honor that MBR as valid, including its
partition scheme. I don't know if it does or not. The kernel won't,
and therefore won't see the partitions, and neither will libblkid.
fdisk
will complain that the partition table is invalid because of the
invalid boot signature, but that's all. The rest of the drive should
be functional and usable--just not bootable.
This is not correct.
Tagging a partition as "bootable" only affects Microsoft OSes.
This is not completely correct. It depends on what boot code is in the
MBR. GRUB boot.img doesn't use the active bit. But parted's code does,
as does syslinux/extlinux.
What a convoluted frickin' mess!!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
