On July 30, 2025 3:20:17 AM GMT-04:00, Dominic Hopf <[email protected]> wrote: >Greetings, > >try using the --allowerasing flag, it should at least remove the >geniuspaste and updatechecker plugin as they're not available anymore >in >EPEL9 for some technical reason. >I wonder why this didn't happen automatically, though. Will need time >to >look into the packaging, but there's plenty of it currently. > >Regards, >Dominic > >On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 3:54 AM H via Users <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Running Rocky Linux 9. Geany 2.1 has been released in EPEL. When I >tried >> to update my system it complained since apparently geany 2.0 was >available >> in @System repository and 2.1 is now in EPEL. >> >> The exact error message is: >> Error: >> Problem 1: cannot install both geany-plugins-common-2.1-2.el9.x86_64 >from >> epel and geany-plugins-common-2.0-3.el9.x86_64 from @System >> - package geany-plugins-geniuspaste-2.0-3.el9.x86_64 from @System >> requires geany-plugins-common = 2.0-3.el9, but none of the providers >can be >> installed >> - cannot install the best update candidate for package >> geany-plugins-common-2.0-3.el9.x86_64 >> - problem with installed package >> geany-plugins-geniuspaste-2.0-3.el9.x86_64 >> Problem 2: cannot install both geany-plugins-common-2.1-2.el9.x86_64 >from >> epel and geany-plugins-common-2.0-3.el9.x86_64 from @System >> - package geany-plugins-addons-2.1-2.el9.x86_64 from epel requires >> geany-plugins-common = 2.1-2.el9, but none of the providers can be >installed >> - package geany-plugins-updatechecker-2.0-3.el9.x86_64 from @System >> requires geany-plugins-common = 2.0-3.el9, but none of the providers >can be >> installed >> - cannot install the best update candidate for package >> geany-plugins-addons-2.0-3.el9.x86_64 >> - problem with installed package >> geany-plugins-updatechecker-2.0-3.el9.x86_64 >> (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting >> packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or >'--nobest' to >> use not only best candidate packages) >> >> It looks like one way to update would be to include the >--allowerasing >> flag, another is presumably to first remove grant 2.0 and then >install 2.1. >> >> I am leaning towards the first, or am I thinking wrong? >> >> Thanks. >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >>
Thank you, will try that. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
