In message <[email protected]> Christian Helmuth <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > I do not know which "issue" you are referring to but I'm quite aware > that we had repeating discussions about "partial reads". I see words > above as your "opinion" about the matter and in no way "standard". > POSIX and also the ISO C standard are quite explicit about the > problematic nature of read() returning a short count in some cases. > Both standards leave it to the programmer to cope with these > situations and additionally provide a tool for the lazy - fread() [1]. > So, if you don't want to treat short/partial reads in your code, just > use fread(), but never spread misleading opinions as universal truth. Thanks for the clarification. Didn't know that it was as it should. I use fread from now on. Michael _______________________________________________ Genode users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.genode.org/listinfo/users
