I like this too... It's interesting that while the syntax isn't exactly the same for giving both classes & functions attributes they are both getting that information in the same way. I was previously worried about the differences between classes & functions but I think this brings it all together.
________________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanghyeon Seo Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 8:58 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] .NET Attributes 2006/3/28, Sanghyeon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I like __attributes__ solution. As pointed out already, decorators can't be used with classes as of 2.4. But __attributes__ can be attached to classes or functions. I agree that decorators would be nice. Perhaps something like the following in clr module? def f(arg): pass f.__attributes__ = [Foo(), Bar(1)] equivalent to: @attributes(Foo(), Bar(1)) def f(arg): pass where cool_attributes = attributes(Foo(), Bar(1)) @cool_attributes def f(arg): pass @cool_attributes def g(arg): pass is possible. Just my 2c. Seo Sanghyeon _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
