Title: Bericht
Although other options of course are welcome, I personally favor the zero-impact installation.
It gives me insight and precise control.
 
By the way I think RC2 is quite good. Before my holicays I tried RC1 and many things fall over in my apps.
I anticipated to have a lot to repair after the holidays, but with RC2 everything seems to run alright again.
 
Jacques de Hooge
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Martin Maly
Verzonden: Sunday, August 27, 2006 3:43 AM
Aan: Discussion of IronPython
Onderwerp: Re: [IronPython] Final release packaging

Our intention is to continue our tradition of zero-impact installers and release the 1.0 as the zip file.
It seems though that it may be worth looking at the msi release (in addition to the zip file) as a possibility...
 
Martin
 
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jeff sacksteder
Sent: Saturday, August 26, 2006 6:09 PM
To: users@lists.ironpython.com
Subject: [IronPython] Final release packaging

I haven't heard any discussion about how the final release will be packaged. Will it be similar to the existing releases or a more polished msi? I'd like to see an installer with that drops the binaries into a known location and adds it to the system path, add itself to add/remove programs, etc- at least create a shell shortcut so that I can do start->run->ipy. Maybe register an association with.py files(asking first, of course.)

Thoughts?

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

Reply via email to