On 9/15/06, Michael Foord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charlie Moad wrote: > >> Take away decorator support and you'll lose at least this Python > >> programmer... > >> Decorators and attributes have at least some commonality, which is why > >> this syntax ended up in Python in the first place... > >> Allowing decorator syntax in places CPython doesn't is better than not > >> allowing it where it does... > >> > > > > So it sounds like people want decorator syntax for attributes. Would > > it be sufficient to check for inheritance from System.Attribute to > > distinguish the two? > Sounds very good. > > > Also attributes being classes and decorators > > functions might help.
> Can't CPython decorators also be classes (I haven't tried this) ? Callable classes I suppose.... _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
