Is there a reason not to pick up Seo's version? His "license" ("do whatever
... you want") would certainly allow it. Is the wheel he built not round
enough?
At 11:40 AM 9/11/2006, Dino Viehland wrote
>Originally we were trying to implement "_socket" instead of "socket". We ran
>into one problem with this: the standard socket.py module has an implicit
>dependency upon CPython's reference counting garbage collector (for
>implementing dup). We considered a hack to make this work but ultimately
>rejected it in favor of implementing "socket" instead replacing the standard
>Python module. Unfortunately makefile didn't make it - and that looks like
>the same thing for ssl (it's present in CPythons socket but not _socket).
>
>Select was a much simpler case of just not getting to it in time. We'll ship
>a select implementation w/ the 1.1 release - we'll need to look at makefile &
>ssl though (makefile should be trivial, hopefully ssl will be just as trivial).
J. Merrill / Analytical Software Corp
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
