My original comments were a little tongue-in-cheek. I got a kick out of the "wording" of the license. Objectively, I would have to agree with your thoughts about whether or not the license would hold up, at least in an American court.
I would have to say that either an MIT or BSD license would probably be the most liberal. -Nathan -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sylvain Hellegouarch Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 6:19 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] FePy SourceForge website updates > I am not saying Seo's choice of license was a bad one, but I don't know > if it has a value by itself that's all. The question is not to please > people but to convey the correct rights as well as the responsability > you take as the provide for the piece of software. The MIT license is as > easy to understand and does just that IMO ;) Mind you it seems some people believe the public domain license such as the MIT one is actually not a license: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6225 via http://programming.reddit.com/info/k9kl/comments - Sylvain _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
