> this is valuable information, particularly for someone like me who is > interested in FePy, but doesn't have time to explore it and discover > the practical considerations, myself. so ultimately i'm glad you > spoke up - but have the impression, from the discussion, that you > overstated your case, in a way that could convince some that FePy is > less generally useful than it actually is. > > (reading through the thread, i was wishing that both you and frederik > would have gotten less wrapped up in trying to prove the other wrong, > and worked more to identify what the reasons were for the different > perspectives - you both had legitimate reasons for your statements. i > would then, as a reader, have had to work less hard to wade through > the other stuff and see what the real issues were.) >
I have to admit then that I poorly explained myself. Apology then. However my comments were targetting IP not IPCE. In fact IPCE is the reason why I can play with IP currently so definitely I would not shoot at IPCE. _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
