Adding to this a bit, the mentioned O'ReillyNet article is Edd Dumbill's
October 2004 article "Seven Cool Mono Apps" [
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2004/10/18/mono.html] -- things have
changed a bit since then (the official 1.0 mono release was only 4 months
old) and while the coverage of the 2.0 spec is incomplete, I think it
deserves more coverage credit than "the API coverage is limited to
.Net 1.1with limited support for
2.0."
No offense intended, but it seems "Coding4Fun" should be doing some
"Research4Real" before his/her next post on "the other .NET framework."
On 12/8/06, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I notice that miguel gets called 'someone'("someone has even porting
Paint.Net to Mono.")
Like calling anders 'a c# dev'
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith J. Farmer
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 4:37 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: [IronPython] [OT] Coding4Fun + Mono
http://blogs.msdn.com/coding4fun/archive/2006/12/08/1241768.aspx
Nice to see good, free press.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
