> > 2007/10/3, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Reason I'm asking if IronPython doesn't require interop assemblies to > > access COM objects then the issue of supporting pythong standard > > libraries become atleast less of an issue?
There's "feature compatibility" (both products support COM) and "source compatibility" (my COM-using app runs unchanged under either CPython or IronPython). Whether or not feature compatibility is sufficient is presumably going to be up to the community and the way it votes for changes. On 10/3/07, Sanghyeon Seo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't see how two are related, given that Python standard library > doesn't use COM. There is COM support in the Pythonwin extensions. Some people might consider this to be part of the standard library under Windows, even though it's not an official part of Python. -- Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
