I took on Cooper's advice and profiled with ANTS. Here are the top methods:

Namespace Method name Time (sec.) Time with children (sec.) Hit count Source
file  System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Go() 37.0189 94.4676
13689612
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Operator() 6.2411 6.2411
131146274
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Advance(int i) 5.9264
8.7202 66000263
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.SetOperator(int op) 5.5750
5.5750 131146274
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Backtrack() 5.5692 9.4895
37781343
 IronPython.Runtime.Operations Ops.CallWithContext(ICallerContext context,
object func, object arg0, object arg1) 5.5572 114.5245 79754
 IronPython.Runtime.Calls Method.Call(ICallerContext context, object arg0)
4.9052 114.8251 50886
 IronPython.Runtime.Calls PythonFunction.CallInstance(ICallerContext
context, object arg0, object arg1) 4.8876 114.8059 50886
 IronPython.Runtime.Calls Function2.Call(ICallerContext context, object
arg0, object arg1) 4.6400 114.5471 47486
 IronPython.Runtime.Operations Ops.CallWithContext(ICallerContext context,
object func, object arg0) 4.2344 114.1604 146658
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexBoyerMoore.Scan(string text, int index,
int beglimit, int endlimit) 3.6465 3.6465 13678131
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexCharClass.CharInClassRecursive(char ch,
string set, int start) 3.6288 5.7113 31508162
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Goto(int newpos) 3.2058
5.1470 27364668
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Operand(int i) 3.1923
3.1923 73230687
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexRunner.EnsureStorage() 3.0803 3.0803
51474823
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexCharClass.CharInClass(char ch, string
set) 3.0713 8.7827 31508162
 IronPython.Runtime.Calls Method.Call(ICallerContext context, object arg0,
object arg1) 2.9821 7.8675 15012
 IronPython.Runtime.Calls PythonFunction.CallInstance(ICallerContext
context, object arg0, object arg1, object arg2) 2.9794 7.8639 15012
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Forwardcharnext() 2.8852
2.8852 62865185
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Forwardchars() 2.8279
2.8279 59436277
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexCharClass.CharInClassInternal(char ch,
string set, int start, int mySetLength, int myCategoryLength) 2.0632 2.0826
31508162
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexRunner.Scan(Regex regex, string text,
int textbeg, int textend, int textstart, int prevlen, bool quick) 1.8376
101.7226 43009
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.FindFirstChar() 1.6405
5.3456 13701755
 IronPython.Runtime.Types OldClass.TryLookupSlot(SymbolId name, out object
ret) 1.5573 2.8124 389516
 IronPython.Runtime.Operations Ops.GetAttr(ICallerContext context, object o,
SymbolId name) 1.5365 5.3456 558524
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Textpos() 1.4020 1.4020
32648926
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Advance() 1.1916 2.9526
13703950
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Textto(int newpos) 1.1218
1.1218 24120890
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.TrackPeek() 1.0579 1.0579
24120894
 System.Text.RegularExpressions Regex.Run(bool quick, int prevlen, string
input, int beginning, int length, int startat) 0.7280 102.4644 43009
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.TrackPush(int I1) 0.6834
0.6834 13745149
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.StackPush(int I1) 0.6542
0.6542 13703955
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.TrackPop() 0.6068 0.6068
13663035
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.TrackPush() 0.6049 0.6049
13708230
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.StackPop() 0.5836 0.5836
13703956
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.Bump() 0.4987 0.4987
10472790
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.TrackPush(int I1, int I2)
0.4864 0.4864 10472790
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.TrackPeek(int i) 0.4663
0.4663 10457859
 System.Text.RegularExpressions RegexInterpreter.TrackPop(int framesize)
0.4396 0.4396 10457859

Moving up the stack of regex.Go(), most calls originate from sgmllib's
parse_starttag.

HTH,
-Birsch

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Birsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thanks Michael and Dino.
>
> I'll prof and send update. Got a good profiler recommendation for .Net?
> Meanwhile I noticed the sample site below causes BeautifulSoup to generate
> quite a few [python] exceptions during __init__. Does IronPython handle
> exceptions significantly slower than CPtyhon?
>
> Repro code is simple (just build a BeautifulSoup obj with mininova's home
> page).
> Here are the .py and .cs I used to time the diffs:
>
> *bstest.py:*
> #Bypass CPython default socket implementation with IPCE/FePy
> import imp, os, sys
> sys.modules['socket'] = module = imp.new_module('socket')
> execfile('socket.py', module.__dict__)
>
> from BeautifulSoup import BeautifulSoup
> from urllib import urlopen
> import datetime
>
> def getContent(url):
>     #Download html data
>     startTime = datetime.datetime.now()
>     print "Getting url", url
>     html = urlopen(url).read()
>     print "Time taken:", datetime.datetime.now() - startTime
>
>     #Make soup
>     startTime = datetime.datetime.now()
>     print "Making soup..."
>     soup = BeautifulSoup(markup=html)
>     print "Time taken:", datetime.datetime.now() - startTime
>
> if __name__ == "__main__":
>     print getContent("www.mininova.org")
>
>
> *C#:*
> using System;
> using System.Collections.Generic;
> using System.Text;
> using IronPython.Hosting;
>
> namespace IronPythonBeautifulSoupTest
> {
>     public class Program
>     {
>         public static void Main(string[] args)
>         {
>             //Init
>             System.Console.WriteLine("Starting...");
>             DateTime start = DateTime.Now;
>             PythonEngine engine = new PythonEngine();
>
>             //Add paths:
>             //BeautifulSoup.py, socket.py, bstest.py located on exe dir
>             engine.AddToPath(@".");
>             //CPython Lib (replace with your own)
>             engine.AddToPath(@"D:\Dev\Python\Lib");
>
>             //Import and load
>             TimeSpan span = DateTime.Now - start;
>             System.Console.WriteLine("[1] Import: " + span.TotalSeconds);
>             DateTime d = DateTime.Now;
>             engine.ExecuteFile(@"bstest.py");
>             span = DateTime.Now - d;
>             System.Console.WriteLine("[2] Load: " + span.TotalSeconds);
>
>             //Execute
>             d = DateTime.Now;
>             engine.Execute("getContent(\"http://www.mininova.org\";)");
>             span = DateTime.Now - d;
>             System.Console.WriteLine("[3] Execute: " + span.TotalSeconds);
>             span = DateTime.Now - start;
>             System.Console.WriteLine("Total: " + span.TotalSeconds);
>
>         }
>     }
> }
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Dino Viehland <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We've actually had this issue reported once before a long time ago -
> > it's a very low CodePlex ID -
> > http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=651
> >
> > We haven't had a chance to investigate the end-to-end scenario.  If
> > someone could come up with a smaller simpler repro that'd be great.
> >  Otherwise we haven't forgotten about it we've just had more immediately
> > pressing issues to work on :(.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Foord
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:20 AM
> > To: Discussion of IronPython
> > Subject: Re: [IronPython] Slow Performance of CPython libs?
> >
> > Birsch wrote:
> > > Hi - We've been using IronPython successfully to allow extensibility
> > > of our application.
> > >
> > > Overall we are happy with the performance, with the exception of
> > > BeautifulSoup which seems to run very slowly: x5 or more time to
> > > execute compared to CPython.
> > >
> > > Most of the time seems to be spent during __init__() of BS, where the
> > > markup is parsed.
> > >
> > > We suspect this has to do with the fact that our CPython env is
> > > executing .pyc files and can precompile its libs, while the IronPython
> > > environment compiles each iteration. We couldn't find a way to
> > > pre-compile the libs and then introduce them into the code, but in any
> > > case this will result in a large management overhead since the amount
> > > of CPython libs we expose to our users contains 100's of modules.
> > >
> > > Any ideas on how to optimize?
> >
> > I think it is worth doing real profiling to find out where the time is
> > being spent during parsing.
> >
> > If it is spending most of the time in '__init__' then the time is
> > probably not spent in importing - so compilation isn't relevant and it
> > is a runtime performance issue. (Importing is much slower with
> > IronPython and at Resolver Systems we do use precompiled binaries - but
> > strangely enough it doesn't provide much of a performance gain.)
> >
> > Michael
> > http://www.manning.com/foord
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Birsch
> > >
> > > Note: we're using FePy/IPCE libs with regular IP v1.1.1 runtime DLLs
> > > (this was done to overcome library incompatibilities and network
> > > errors). However, the relevant slow .py code (mainly SGMLParser and
> > > BeautifulSoup) is the same.
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users@lists.ironpython.com
> > > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@lists.ironpython.com
> > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users@lists.ironpython.com
> > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com

Reply via email to