If you need a strongly-named assembly and can't wait for the next beta, then yes, that's your only choice. The next beta is expected around the second week of September, if I remember correctly.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:15 AM, hellosticky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, any ideas here? Should I just rebuild from source and sign with my > own strong key? > > Thanks, > > ------------------------------ > *From:* hellosticky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 27, 2008 2:35 PM > *To:* 'Dave Fugate'; 'Discussion of IronPython'; 'Curt Hagenlocher' > *Subject:* RE: [IronPython] Building from source > > Thanks Dave, I have SP1 and I'll figure out how to build 2.x binaries > with 3.5. Do you have any idea about: > > error CS1577: Assembly generation failed -- Referenced assembly > 'Microsoft.Scripting' does not have a strong name > > Thanks, > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Dave Fugate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 27, 2008 2:33 PM > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Discussion of IronPython'; 'Curt > Hagenlocher' > *Subject:* RE: [IronPython] Building from source > > Yes, .NET 3.5's msbuild can be used to generate IronPython (2.x) binaries > that will run under .NET 2.0 SP1 in the manner I showed below. This is what > we use for generating IronPython Alpha/Beta/etc releases. Please note that > you won't be able to run IronPython 2.x without SP1 of .NET 2.0 (or > alternatively .NET 3.5) installed though. > > > > It hasn't been possible to build IronPython.sln under Visual Studio 2005 > for a couple of release cycles. > > > > *From:* hellosticky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:34 AM > *To:* Dave Fugate; 'Discussion of IronPython'; 'Curt Hagenlocher' > *Subject:* RE: [IronPython] Building from source > > > > Hi Dave, I was using a build from last night's source by Michael Foord. > They didn't have a PublicKeyToken and in VS 2005 I got the error: > > > > error CS1577: Assembly generation failed -- Referenced assembly > 'Microsoft.Scripting' does not have a strong name > > Can I use your MSBuild (using 3.5) to target 2.0? > > > > Thanks, > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Dave Fugate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 27, 2008 12:25 PM > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of IronPython; 'Curt Hagenlocher' > *Subject:* RE: [IronPython] Building from source > > Hi, the source updates to CodePlex's TFS repository and the source zip > files should not even include the ability to delay-sign assemblies. I've > just verified this is still the case with the update to CodePlex yesterday. > Which IronPython binaries are you trying to run and what error message are > you getting? > > > > The other thing is you shouldn't need Visual Studio 2008 to build the > latest IronPython sources from CodePlex's TFS repository. You just need > .NET 3.5 installed and the following should work: > > pushd %WHEREEVER%\IronPython-38029\IronPython_Main\Src > > C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.5\MSBuild > IronPython.sln > > > > Dave > > > > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *hellosticky > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:51 AM > *To:* 'Curt Hagenlocher'; 'Discussion of IronPython' > *Subject:* Re: [IronPython] Building from source > > > > I can't even run DLR/IronPython without a strong name, so that'd be nice > :). I actually don't really mind signing them myself for now > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Curt Hagenlocher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:04 AM > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of IronPython > *Subject:* Re: [IronPython] Building from source > > You need a certificate to sign the assembly if you want a strong name -- > and of course any certificate that Michael has or generates won't have the > same key signature as the certificate we use to sign here. > > > > For IronRuby, we've modified the export script so that building from source > will no longer delay-sign the assembly but just leave it unsigned. Is this > something that people would find useful for our regular source drops? If > so, I can try to cajole Dave into changing the script. He probably doesn't > have enough work to do anyway ;). > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:53 AM, hellosticky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi Michael, thanks. I'll be getting VS 2008 hopefully in a week or two. By > the way, would you be able to build yours with a strong name? > Thanks, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Foord [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 5:48 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of IronPython > > Subject: Re: [IronPython] Building from source > > > > hellosticky wrote: > > > Hi, I downloaded the latest change set of IronPython from > > CodePlex source code tab, but the SLN file doesn't load in VS > > 2005, and running NMAKE it looks like there are C# 3.0 or 3.5 > > features being used. > > > > > > How do I build a .NET 2.0 version of IronPython from source? > > > > > > > VS 2008 can build a .NET 2.0 version (and VS Express should work I > > think), but I'm pretty sure that VS 2005 won't be able to build it. > > > > I built from the latest sources last night, it is up at: > > > > http://www.voidspace.org.uk/Ipy-38029.zip > > > > (Release binaries only, 2.8mb, no warranties etc!) > > > > Michael > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Users mailing list > > > Users@lists.ironpython.com > > > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ > > http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ > > http://www.trypython.org/ > > http://www.ironpython.info/ > > http://www.resolverhacks.net/ > > http://www.theotherdelia.co.uk/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > > > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
