"IronPython 3k"... does that mean that IPy 2.1 is targeted to be compatible with CPython 2.6? (Please say "yes"!) -- Vernon Cole
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just one other comment on top of what Curt said. You might more properly > think of Main as IronPython 3k. Main includes a ton of renames and other > breaking made in Microsoft.Scripting.Core/System.Core that will end up in > .NET 4.0. We're still working on what we want to do for 2.1 (and input is > always welcome of course) but our current thinking is that it will be API > compatible w/ 2.0. > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
