That is great news, and a great solution! Thanks!
Adam From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Schementi Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 9:25 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1 Rather than just releasing builds, I'm waiting on the OK from the ASP.NET to release to source code for it, so it can be included in the IronPython releases and the Codeplex sources/daily builds. That seems like a much better solution. =) I'll keep you posted (I've been in conference-mode for the past couple months, so things have been slow, sorry!). From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Adam Brand Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 5:39 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1 Any updated timeline on this (IronPython 2.6/ASP.Net Integration)? Just wanted to check in and see where it was on the list. Thanks, Adam 2009/3/30 Jimmy Schementi <jimmy.scheme...@microsoft.com> A IronPython 2.6 version of the ASP.NET integration will be out shortly, I have to get time to make a build and get it sent over to the ASP.NET team. I'm working through some other things I need to get done first, but assume two weeks. From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Adam Brand Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 1:37 PM To: 'Discussion of IronPython' Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1 Any update on the timeline for getting IronPython for ASP.Net updated? This would make a world of difference for our IronPython-based web app. Adam Adam Brand SilverKey Technologies From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Dody Gunawinata Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 1:09 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Announcing IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1 This is awesome. Web application can benefit from this "adaptive compilation" approach a lot - especially for low trafficked sites. On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Giles Thomas <giles.tho...@resolversystems.com> wrote: Dave, This is great news, congratulations to the IP team on this release! We'll do a test-port of Resolver One early next week and will reply to the list with any issues we find. Cheers, Giles Dave Fugate wrote: Hello Python Community, We're pleased to announce the release of IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1. As you might imagine, this release is all about supporting new CPython 2.6 features such as the 'bytes' and 'bytearray' types (PEP 3112), decorators for classes (PEP 3129), advanced string formatting (PEP 3101), etc. The minimum .NET version required for this release is the same as IronPython 2.0; namely .NET 2.0 Service Pack 1. Unlike the 2.0 series of IronPython, we plan to release only a couple Alphas and Betas of IronPython 2.6. As such, it's key that we get your feedback on the release(s) quickly to incorporate requested changes. Besides CPython 2.6 features, another significant change in this release is that ipy.exe now uses "adaptive compilation" by default. Adaptive compilation is a technique in which IronPython: 1. Interprets and executes Python method calls up to /N/ times for a given method. If you're only going to execute a method a few times, it's typically faster to interpret the method instead of compiling and executing it 2. Compiles and executes the Python method call on the /N+1/ invocation of the method. Compilation of a Python method is a heavyweight operation, but we can reuse the result for subsequent invocations 3. Reuses the previously compiled method for new calls to the Python method. This operation is much faster than interpreting the method call as the method was already compiled in the previous step The reason for this change is that it provides a nice performance gain for Python code containing lots of functions/methods that only get called a few times. All this said, this feature is still undergoing active development and as a consequence some Python scripts may actually run slower with it turned on. For this reason, our old default mode of running Python scripts is still available by passing the -O or -D flags to ipy.exe. Any feedback on how this new feature affects your IronPython applications performance-wise would be greatly appreciated. There's also a few minor changes since IronPython 2.0.1 that are worth calling out here: . IronPython.msi now installs NGEN'ed binaries by default . IronPython.msi now offers a little more selection with respect to what you'd like to install. For example, Silverlight templates are optional . The default installation location of IronPython.msi no longer indicates whether the 2.6 release is an Alpha, Beta, or a patched release. Future IronPython 2.6 installations will replace previous 2.6 releases which will be uninstalled automatically . The -X:PreferComInteropAssembly flag has been removed. All COM interop is now done through normal COM dispatch You can download IronPython 2.6 Alpha 1 at: http://ironpython.codeplex.com/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=22982 The IronPython Team ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com -- nomadlife.org _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com -- Adam Brand Managing Partner SilverKey Technologies Direct: +1-312-239-6722 Main: +1-312-951-7525 Skype: adamsilverkey Email: ad...@silverkeytech.com www.silverkeytech.com
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com