I believe this was fixed for 2.6, but that the fix is too disruptive to backport (by a long shot!)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk>wrote: > Issue 22239 has been closed as 'by design'. > > > http://ironpython.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=22239&ProjectName=IronPython > > Dino described this as a serious bug when it was pointed out and it is both > extremely unintuitive and problematic - why should separate scopes (modules) > be linked this way when used from the hosting API? > > This seems like a very odd decision. > > All the best, > > Michael Foord > > -- > http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ > http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
