My first tests with your method shows good improvement (2x) Thanks a lot,
- Patrick On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Dino Viehland <[email protected]> wrote: > One option is to define __slots__ on your classes and not include > __dict__ in the list of slots. This will limit the attributes you can store > on the object and the objects will all be stored in an array instead of a > dictionary. __slots__ should include each attribute you want to be able to > set: > > > > class object(object): > > __slots__ = [‘a’, ‘b’, ‘c’] > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Deschênes > *Sent:* Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:00 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [IronPython] Many small objects and memory footprint > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm currently using IronPython to manage a big tree of small objects. > Everything works as fine but the memory usage is really huge (about 6x > greater than the same program writtent in C#). I assumed the memory usage > would be greater in dynamic language than in C#. Since I really need to > have a small memory footprint, what strategy should I use to keep the memory > usage low. > > > > NOTE: There's many classes already written in python and I would really > like to keep using python, but I'm open to suggestion. > > > > Patrick > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
