On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Dino Viehland <[email protected]> wrote: > What if we required the extension to be named "_foo.ipyd" or "_foo.ipe" > or something along those lines which would be similar to CPython's > .pyd extension? That way we wouldn't be querying random DLLs that > might or might not load and might have unexpected side effects.
Apparently CPython will only load .pyd and not .dll as of 2.5 (which I just discovered), so it sounds like that is the way to go. I vote for .ipyd. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any way to change the extension of a class library from .dll (other than a post-build step), so you should go bug the VS team about that :) - Jeff _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
