Are IronPython and the DLR so closely coupled that you *need* the source for both to work on it? Or can you simply develop/test IronPython using the DLR in the GAC?
I'd rather have the standard library as a 'default' part of the IronPython checkout than the DLR, primarily because a binary distro of the DLR makes more sense. On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:54, Tristan Zajonc <trist...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've used both hg+bitbucket and git+github. In my experience, there is very > little difference between hg and git in terms of workflow. I found both to > be great and the tools are pretty mature across all platforms. I do think > GitHub is rapidly becoming a killer application for open source projects. > If you look at the IronRuby repository > (http://github.com/ironruby/ironruby), there are already 340 watchers and > 109 forks, which is a non-negligible consideration imho. > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Noah Gift <noah.g...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Jeff Hardy <jdha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Miguel de Icaza <mig...@novell.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Moving to Git seems like a no brainer to me: we only have to move >>> > IronPython >>> > there. If we were to pick another of the open source source code >>> > management systems we would be moving both Ruby and Python away. >>> >>> Where I'm torn is that IronPython is between a rock and a hard place - >>> on the one hand, I want to work closely with the Mono project (which >>> would strongly imply using github), but I also want to be in sync with >>> the Python community (which has largely embraced hg). >>> >>> Python's separated stdlib will be a Mercurial repo, and if IronPython >>> were in Hg we could easily pull in the stdlib as a subrepo. However, I >>> presume the DLR will stay on github, and we'll need to pull that in as >>> well, which of course would be easier from git. >>> >>> Damned if we do, damned if we don't. I'm leaning towards Mercurial >>> because I prefer it, and it seems like many other people do as well. I >>> know hg can pull from git, but I don't know about the reverse. >>> >>> > If the concern is the UI for checking code out for Git, there is a >>> > transparent bridge that exposes the tree to Subversion which has good >>> > Windows clients. >>> >>> Tortoise-Git is actually very nice now. I don't think git's Windows >>> support is really an issue anymore. >>> >> Haven't tried it, but this looks interesting: >> >> http://www.serpentine.com/blog/2010/10/10/dual-bitbucketgithub-citizenship/ >>> >>> - Jeff >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> Users@lists.ironpython.com >>> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> >> Noah >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@lists.ironpython.com >> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
