Jeff wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Tomas Matousek > <tomas.matou...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > IronRuby doesn't use the test runner. IronRuby's harness is written in Ruby > (Languages\Ruby\Tests\Scripts\irtests.rb). It's run by a previous IronRuby > version checked in to Util\IronRuby. > > So is there any value whatsoever in keeping the TestRunner around? If there > isn't, I'll look into porting the IronPython test infrastructure to use > unittest.
As long as all of the tests we want to run keep running there's no reason to keep TestRunner - it was just a way to run all of the same tests we ran before w/o relying upon internal MS infrastructure. I'm not sure how many of the DLR tests we'll still want to run but I imagine we can just wrap them in unittest and have it run the EXEs. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
