> Richard, any particular reason you went with NUnit? I went with NUnit because it's the one I'm most familiar with and the one that seems to be in wide spread use. The CI build servers that I've used ( TeamCity<http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/features/supported_platforms.html#Testing_Frameworks>, CruiseControl.net<http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CCNET/Using+CruiseControl.NET+with+other+applications>) have NUnit support out the box. I know the CodeBetter build server is TeamCity which would mean setting up NUnit would be fairly easy.
Having said that, I don't feel really strongly about the use of NUnit as my main goal was just removing a dependency on Visual Studio. Richard On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Jeff Hardy <jdha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Tomas Matousek > <tomas.matou...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > I have an experience with xUnit.net ( > http://xunit.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=WhyDidWeBuildXunit&referringTitle=Home), > so I would personally prefer that one. It has a pretty good VS integration. > I haven't used NUnit. If you prefer it I don't have objections. > > One nice thing about NUnit is just how little needs to change from MSTest. > > I do wonder how much of a change going to xUnit.net would be, as all > of my experience is with xUnit.net as well. Richard, any particular > reason you went with NUnit? > > - Jeff > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.ironpython.com > http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com