2009/1/3 Aymeric Moizard <[email protected]>: > This specification draft-ietf-sip-outbound-16 ios only about SIP: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-outbound-16
True, I didn't read it. Thanks. > So for 100% of UA, STUN is usable for keeping alive and detecting > IP changes on the SIP connection. > > Don't you want kamailio to be standard? Why do you thing so? Of course I want it. I was just asking a question, no more. ;) > For RTP? Even if you put a STUN server on another port, that would > not be of any help at all... because only part of the 100% can use > the STUN discovered address in their RTP and such solution would not > work 100%. Which is the reason for it? do you mean those routers that "sometimes" behave as symmetric NAT router and other times not? Or perhaps you mean that even in a normal and correct router (not symmetric NAT) STUN would not work on 100% of cases? > Instead for RTP, ICE and TURN are required. That's just a different > server that has to be installed: NOT THE SAME as the one running on > the SIP server which is ONLY doing STUN binding request. Well, AFAIK ICE is very far from being interoperable, isn't it? And TURN requires RTP through a media proxy, that is not a very scalable solution :( Thanks for your reply and thanks for your work :) -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
