El Jueves, 10 de Diciembre de 2009, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió: > does the 503 reply include a retry-after header?
Does Kamailio behaviour depends on that header? If so IMHO it's not correct. I've joined long discussions in sip-implementors about 503 with/without Retry-After header. Some people think that a 503 without this header must be considered as a 500. But after discussions this assumption is not correct and a 503 must be considered similary even if it doesn't contain this header. BTW RFC 3263 (Locating SIP Servers) says nothing about 500 error, neither about Retry-After header in 503 replies. It considers a 503 with/without Retry-After in same way. IMHO Kamailio/SR should consider Retry-After just as informative but never change the routing/failover behavior based on it. Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
