On Monday 25 January 2010, Ovidiu Sas wrote: > I'm in favor of keeping this module as a db only module. Combining > both init methods (param and db config) is messy due to the current > module initialization (the shm mem is not available during the param > parsing). For small/embedded systems db_text is always a viable alternative.
Hello Ovidiu, i did not reviewed the code yet, but some people also like to run their balancers without a database to avoid this additional complexity. > In the future, the ratelimit module should become obsolete and only > pipelimit should be maintained. Sure, if the functionality that most people use in ratelimit is also available there, it makes no sense to keep both. > Also, I'm in favor of keeping the new module as simple as possible and > perform any fancy operations in the config file (like regex to pv via > textops). I agree, this should be all done in the configuration, its much easier to maintain. Cheers, Henning _______________________________________________ Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
