The patch for limiting the port range used by OpenMPI sounds useful.
This *is* an issue with firewalls. For a dedicated cluster behind a
firewall that's ok, but for harnessing available hardware (eg, Mac
OSX systems) in the wee hours its not. Gets my vote!
James Conway
On Aug 31, 2007, at 8:26 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
George --
What do you say about committing your patch?
On Aug 31, 2007, at 7:06 AM, Simon Hammond wrote:
On 31/08/2007, Gleb Natapov <gl...@voltaire.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:49:10AM +0200, Sven Stork wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2007 09:07, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:04:00AM +0100, Simon Hammond wrote:
On 31/08/2007, Lev Givon <l...@columbia.edu> wrote:
Received from George Bosilca on Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at
07:42:52PM EDT:
I have a patch for this, but I never felt a real need for it,
so I never push it in the trunk. I'm not completely
convinced that
we need it, except in some really strange situations (read
grid). Why
do you need a port range ? For avoiding firewalls ?
...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
James Conway, PhD.,
Department of Structural Biology
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Biomedical Science Tower 3, Room 2047
3501 5th Ave
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
U.S.A.
Phone: +1-412-383-9847
Fax: +1-412-648-8998
Email: jxc...@pitt.edu
Web: <http://www.pitt.edu/~jxc100/> (under construction)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
