Sorry, I don't understand, how can I try the fortran from macports??.

2009/5/6 Luis Vitorio Cargnini <lvcargn...@gmail.com>

> This problem is occuring because the fortran wasn't compiled with the debug
> symbols:
> warning: Could not find object file
> "/Users/admin/build/i386-apple-darwin9.0.0/libgcc/_udiv_w_sdiv_s.o" - no
> debug information available for
> "../../../gcc-4.3-20071026/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c".
>
> Is the same problem for who is using LLVM in Xcode, there is no debug
> symbols to create a debug release, try create a release and see if it will
> compile at all and try the fortran from macports it will works smoothly.
>
>
> Le 09-05-05 à 17:33, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
>
>
>  I agree; that is a bummer.  :-(
>>
>> Warner -- do you have any advice here, perchance?
>>
>>
>> On May 4, 2009, at 7:26 PM, Vicente Puig wrote:
>>
>>  But it doesn't work well.
>>>
>>> For example, I am trying to debug a program, "floyd" in this case, and
>>> when I make a breakpoint:
>>>
>>> No line 26 in file "../../../gcc-4.2-20060805/libgfortran/fmain.c".
>>>
>>> I am getting disappointed and frustrated that I can not work well with
>>> openmpi in my Mac. There should be a was to make it run in Xcode, uff...
>>>
>>> 2009/5/4 Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com>
>>> I get those as well.  I believe that they are (annoying but) harmless --
>>> an artifact of how the freeware gcc/gofrtran that I use was built.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 4, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Vicente Puig wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe I had to open a new thread, but if you have any idea why I receive
>>> it when I use gdb for debugging an openmpi program:
>>>
>>> warning: Could not find object file
>>> "/Users/admin/build/i386-apple-darwin9.0.0/libgcc/_umoddi3_s.o" - no debug
>>> information available for
>>> "../../../gcc-4.3-20071026/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c".
>>>
>>>
>>> warning: Could not find object file
>>> "/Users/admin/build/i386-apple-darwin9.0.0/libgcc/_udiv_w_sdiv_s.o" - no
>>> debug information available for
>>> "../../../gcc-4.3-20071026/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c".
>>>
>>>
>>> warning: Could not find object file
>>> "/Users/admin/build/i386-apple-darwin9.0.0/libgcc/_udivmoddi4_s.o" - no
>>> debug information available for
>>> "../../../gcc-4.3-20071026/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c".
>>>
>>>
>>> warning: Could not find object file
>>> "/Users/admin/build/i386-apple-darwin9.0.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2_s.o" - no debug
>>> information available for
>>> "../../../gcc-4.3-20071026/libgcc/../gcc/unwind-dw2.c".
>>>
>>>
>>> warning: Could not find object file
>>> "/Users/admin/build/i386-apple-darwin9.0.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde-darwin_s.o"
>>> - no debug information available for
>>> "../../../gcc-4.3-20071026/libgcc/../gcc/unwind-dw2-fde-darwin.c".
>>>
>>>
>>> warning: Could not find object file
>>> "/Users/admin/build/i386-apple-darwin9.0.0/libgcc/unwind-c_s.o" - no debug
>>> information available for
>>> "../../../gcc-4.3-20071026/libgcc/../gcc/unwind-c.c".
>>> .......
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There is no 'admin' so I don't know why it happen. It works well with a C
>>> program.
>>>
>>> Any idea??.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Vincent
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/5/4 Vicente Puig <vpui...@gmail.com>
>>> I can run openmpi perfectly with command line, but I wanted a graphic
>>> interface for debugging because I was having problems.
>>>
>>> Thanks anyway.
>>>
>>> Vincent
>>>
>>> 2009/5/4 Warner Yuen <wy...@apple.com>
>>>
>>> Admittedly, I don't use Xcode to build Open MPI either.
>>>
>>> You can just compile Open MPI from the command line and install
>>> everything in /usr/local/. Make sure that gfortran is set in your path and
>>> you should just be able to do a './configure --prefix=/usr/local'
>>>
>>> After the installation, just make sure that your path is set correctly
>>> when you go to use the newly installed Open MPI. If you don't set your path,
>>> it will always default to using the version of OpenMPI that ships with
>>> Leopard.
>>>
>>>
>>> Warner Yuen
>>> Scientific Computing
>>> Consulting Engineer
>>> Apple, Inc.
>>> email: wy...@apple.com
>>> Tel: 408.718.2859
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 4, 2009, at 9:13 AM, users-requ...@open-mpi.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Send users mailing list submissions to
>>>     us...@open-mpi.org
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>     http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>     users-requ...@open-mpi.org
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>     users-ow...@open-mpi.org
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of users digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>> 1. Re: How do I compile OpenMPI in Xcode 3.1 (Vicente Puig)
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 18:13:45 +0200
>>> From: Vicente Puig <vpui...@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] How do I compile OpenMPI in Xcode 3.1
>>> To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org>
>>> Message-ID:
>>>     <3e9a21680905040913u3f36d3c9rdcd3413bfdcd...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>> If I can not make it work with Xcode,  which one could I use?, which one
>>> do
>>> you use to compile and debug OpenMPI?.
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Vincent
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/5/4 Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com>
>>>
>>> Open MPI comes pre-installed in Leopard; as Warner noted, since Leopard
>>> doesn't ship with a Fortran compiler, the Open MPI that Apple ships has
>>> non-functional mpif77 and mpif90 wrapper compilers.
>>>
>>> So the Open MPI that you installed manually will use your Fortran
>>> compilers, and therefore will have functional mpif77 and mpif90 wrapper
>>> compilers.  Hence, you probably need to be sure to use the "right"
>>> wrapper
>>> compilers.  It looks like you specified the full path specified to
>>> ExecPath,
>>> so I'm not sure why Xcode wouldn't work with that (like I mentioned, I
>>> unfortunately don't use Xcode myself, so I don't know why that wouldn't
>>> work).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 4, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Vicente wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I already have gfortran compiler on /usr/local/bin, the same path
>>> as my mpif90 compiler. But I've seen when I use the mpif90 on /usr/bin
>>> and on  /Developer/usr/bin says it:
>>>
>>> "Unfortunately, this installation of Open MPI was not compiled with
>>> Fortran 90 support.  As such, the mpif90 compiler is non-functional."
>>>
>>>
>>> That should be the problem, I will have to change the path to use the
>>> gfortran I have installed.
>>> How could I do it? (Sorry, I am beginner)
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> El 04/05/2009, a las 17:38, Warner Yuen escribi?:
>>>
>>> Have you installed a Fortran compiler? Mac OS X's developer tools do
>>> not come with a Fortran compiler, so you'll need to install one if
>>> you haven't already done so. I routinely use the Intel IFORT
>>> compilers with success. However, I hear many good things about the
>>> gfortran compilers on Mac OS X, you can't beat the price of gfortran!
>>>
>>>
>>> Warner Yuen
>>> Scientific Computing
>>> Consulting Engineer
>>> Apple, Inc.
>>> email: wy...@apple.com
>>> Tel: 408.718.2859
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 4, 2009, at 7:28 AM, users-requ...@open-mpi.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Send users mailing list submissions to
>>>  us...@open-mpi.org
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>  http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>  users-requ...@open-mpi.org
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>  users-ow...@open-mpi.org
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of users digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>> 1. How do I compile OpenMPI in Xcode 3.1 (Vicente)
>>> 2. Re: 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ?? (Ralph Castain)
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:12:44 +0200
>>> From: Vicente <vpui...@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: [OMPI users] How do I compile OpenMPI in Xcode 3.1
>>> To: us...@open-mpi.org
>>> Message-ID: <1c2c0085-940f-43bb-910f-975871ae2...@gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed";
>>>  DelSp="yes"
>>>
>>> Hi, I've seen the FAQ "How do I use Open MPI wrapper compilers in
>>> Xcode", but it's only for MPICC. I am using MPIF90, so I did the
>>> same,
>>> but changing MPICC for MPIF90, and also the path, but it did not
>>> work.
>>>
>>> Building target ?fortran? of project ?fortran? with configuration
>>> ?Debug?
>>>
>>>
>>> Checking Dependencies
>>> Invalid value 'MPIF90' for GCC_VERSION
>>>
>>>
>>> The file "MPIF90.cpcompspec" looks like this:
>>>
>>> 1 /**
>>> 2         Xcode Coompiler Specification for MPIF90
>>> 3
>>> 4 */
>>> 5
>>> 6 {   Type = Compiler;
>>> 7     Identifier = com.apple.compilers.mpif90;
>>> 8     BasedOn = com.apple.compilers.gcc.4_0;
>>> 9     Name = "MPIF90";
>>> 10     Version = "Default";
>>> 11     Description = "MPI GNU C/C++ Compiler 4.0";
>>> 12     ExecPath = "/usr/local/bin/mpif90";      // This gets
>>> converted to the g++ variant automatically
>>> 13     PrecompStyle = pch;
>>> 14 }
>>>
>>> and is located in "/Developer/Library/Xcode/Plug-ins"
>>>
>>> and when I do mpif90 -v on terminal it works well:
>>>
>>> Using built-in specs.
>>> Target: i386-apple-darwin8.10.1
>>> Configured with: /tmp/gfortran-20090321/ibin/../gcc/configure --
>>> prefix=/usr/local/gfortran --enable-languages=c,fortran --with-gmp=/
>>> tmp/gfortran-20090321/gfortran_libs --enable-bootstrap
>>> Thread model: posix
>>> gcc version 4.4.0 20090321 (experimental) [trunk revision 144983]
>>> (GCC)
>>>
>>>
>>> Any idea??
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Vincent
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 08:28:26 -0600
>>> From: Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ??
>>> To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org>
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <71d2d8cc0905040728h2002f4d7s4c49219eee29e...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I didn't write any of that code - I was just fixing
>>> the
>>> mapper so it would properly map the procs. From what I can tell,
>>> the proper
>>> things are happening there.
>>>
>>> I'll have to dig into the code that specifically deals with parsing
>>> the
>>> results to bind the processes. Afraid that will take awhile longer
>>> - pretty
>>> dark in that hole.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Geoffroy Pignot
>>> <geopig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So, there are no more crashes with my "crazy" mpirun command. But
>>> the
>>> paffinity feature seems to be broken. Indeed I am not able to pin my
>>> processes.
>>>
>>> Simple test with a program using your plpa library :
>>>
>>> r011n006% cat hostf
>>> r011n006 slots=4
>>>
>>> r011n006% cat rankf
>>> rank 0=r011n006 slot=0   ----> bind to CPU 0 , exact ?
>>>
>>> r011n006% /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.4a/bin/mpirun --hostfile hostf --
>>> rankfile
>>> rankf --wdir /tmp -n 1 a.out
>>> PLPA Number of processors online: 4
>>> PLPA Number of processor sockets: 2
>>> PLPA Socket 0 (ID 0): 2 cores
>>> PLPA Socket 1 (ID 3): 2 cores
>>>
>>> Ctrl+Z
>>> r011n006%bg
>>>
>>> r011n006% ps axo stat,user,psr,pid,pcpu,comm | grep gpignot
>>> R+   gpignot    3  9271 97.8 a.out
>>>
>>> In fact whatever the slot number I put in my rankfile , a.out
>>> always runs
>>> on the CPU 3. I was looking for it on CPU 0 accordind to my
>>> cpuinfo file
>>> (see below)
>>> The result is the same if I try another syntax (rank 0=r011n006
>>> slot=0:0
>>> bind to socket 0 - core 0  , exact ? )
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> Geoffroy
>>>
>>> PS: I run on rhel5
>>>
>>> r011n006% uname -a
>>> Linux r011n006 2.6.18-92.1.1NOMAP32.el5 #1 SMP Sat Mar 15 01:46:39
>>> CDT 2008
>>> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> My configure is :
>>> ./configure --prefix=/tmp/openmpi-1.4a --libdir='${exec_prefix}/
>>> lib64'
>>> --disable-dlopen --disable-mpi-cxx --enable-heterogeneous
>>>
>>>
>>> r011n006% cat /proc/cpuinfo
>>> processor       : 0
>>> vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
>>> cpu family      : 6
>>> model           : 15
>>> model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU            5150  @ 2.66GHz
>>> stepping        : 6
>>> cpu MHz         : 2660.007
>>> cache size      : 4096 KB
>>> physical id     : 0
>>> siblings        : 2
>>> core id         : 0
>>> cpu cores       : 2
>>> fpu             : yes
>>> fpu_exception   : yes
>>> cpuid level     : 10
>>> wp              : yes
>>> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
>>> pge mca
>>> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall
>>> nx lm
>>> constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
>>> bogomips        : 5323.68
>>> clflush size    : 64
>>> cache_alignment : 64
>>> address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>>> power management:
>>>
>>> processor       : 1
>>> vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
>>> cpu family      : 6
>>> model           : 15
>>> model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU            5150  @ 2.66GHz
>>> stepping        : 6
>>> cpu MHz         : 2660.007
>>> cache size      : 4096 KB
>>> physical id     : 3
>>> siblings        : 2
>>> core id         : 0
>>> cpu cores       : 2
>>> fpu             : yes
>>> fpu_exception   : yes
>>> cpuid level     : 10
>>> wp              : yes
>>> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
>>> pge mca
>>> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall
>>> nx lm
>>> constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
>>> bogomips        : 5320.03
>>> clflush size    : 64
>>> cache_alignment : 64
>>> address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>>> power management:
>>>
>>> processor       : 2
>>> vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
>>> cpu family      : 6
>>> model           : 15
>>> model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU            5150  @ 2.66GHz
>>> stepping        : 6
>>> cpu MHz         : 2660.007
>>> cache size      : 4096 KB
>>> physical id     : 0
>>> siblings        : 2
>>> core id         : 1
>>> cpu cores       : 2
>>> fpu             : yes
>>> fpu_exception   : yes
>>> cpuid level     : 10
>>> wp              : yes
>>> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
>>> pge mca
>>> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall
>>> nx lm
>>> constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
>>> bogomips        : 5319.39
>>> clflush size    : 64
>>> cache_alignment : 64
>>> address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>>> power management:
>>>
>>> processor       : 3
>>> vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
>>> cpu family      : 6
>>> model           : 15
>>> model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU            5150  @ 2.66GHz
>>> stepping        : 6
>>> cpu MHz         : 2660.007
>>> cache size      : 4096 KB
>>> physical id     : 3
>>> siblings        : 2
>>> core id         : 1
>>> cpu cores       : 2
>>> fpu             : yes
>>> fpu_exception   : yes
>>> cpuid level     : 10
>>> wp              : yes
>>> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
>>> pge mca
>>> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall
>>> nx lm
>>> constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
>>> bogomips        : 5320.03
>>> clflush size    : 64
>>> cache_alignment : 64
>>> address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>>> power management:
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:45:57 -0600
>>> From: Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ??
>>> To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org>
>>> Message-ID: <d01d7b16-4b47-46f3-ad41-d1a90b2e4...@open-mpi.org>
>>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed";
>>>  DelSp="yes"
>>>
>>> My apologies - I wasn't clear enough. You need a tarball from
>>> r21111
>>> or greater...such as:
>>>
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/nightly/trunk/openmpi-1.4a1r21142.tar.gz
>>>
>>> HTH
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 4, 2009, at 2:14 AM, Geoffroy Pignot wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi ,
>>>
>>> I got the openmpi-1.4a1r21095.tar.gz tarball, but unfortunately my
>>> command doesn't work
>>>
>>> cat rankf:
>>> rank 0=node1 slot=*
>>> rank 1=node2 slot=*
>>>
>>> cat hostf:
>>> node1 slots=2
>>> node2 slots=2
>>>
>>> mpirun  --rankfile rankf --hostfile hostf  --host node1 -n 1
>>> hostname : --host node2 -n 1 hostname
>>>
>>> Error, invalid rank (1) in the rankfile (rankf)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [r011n006:28986] [[45541,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> rmaps_rank_file.c at line 403
>>> [r011n006:28986] [[45541,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> base/rmaps_base_map_job.c at line 86
>>> [r011n006:28986] [[45541,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 86
>>> [r011n006:28986] [[45541,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> plm_rsh_module.c at line 1016
>>>
>>>
>>> Ralph, could you tell me if my command syntax is correct or
>>> not ? if
>>> not, give me the expected one ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Geoffroy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/4/30 Geoffroy Pignot <geopig...@gmail.com>
>>> Immediately Sir !!! :)
>>>
>>> Thanks again Ralph
>>>
>>> Geoffroy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:45:39 -0600
>>> From: Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ??
>>> To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org>
>>> Message-ID:
>>>  <71d2d8cc0904300545v61a42fe1k50086d2704d0f...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>> I believe this is fixed now in our development trunk - you can
>>> download any
>>> tarball starting from last night and give it a try, if you like.
>>> Any
>>> feedback would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>>
>>> Ah now, I didn't say it -worked-, did I? :-)
>>>
>>> Clearly a bug exists in the program. I'll try to take a look at it
>>> (if Lenny
>>> doesn't get to it first), but it won't be until later in the week.
>>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:18 AM, Geoffroy Pignot wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree with you Ralph , and that 's what I expect from openmpi
>>> but my
>>> second example shows that it's not working
>>>
>>> cat hostfile.0
>>> r011n002 slots=4
>>> r011n003 slots=4
>>>
>>> cat rankfile.0
>>> rank 0=r011n002 slot=0
>>> rank 1=r011n003 slot=1
>>>
>>> mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -n 1
>>> hostname
>>> ### CRASHED
>>>
>>> Error, invalid rank (1) in the rankfile (rankfile.0)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> rmaps_rank_file.c at line 404
>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> base/rmaps_base_map_job.c at line 87
>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 77
>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> plm_rsh_module.c at line 985
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> A daemon (pid unknown) died unexpectedly on signal 1  while
>>> attempting to
>>> launch so we are aborting.
>>>
>>> There may be more information reported by the environment (see
>>> above).
>>>
>>> This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the needed
>>> shared
>>> libraries on the remote node. You may set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>>> to
>>> have the
>>> location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this
>>> will
>>> automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> orterun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the
>>> process
>>> that caused that situation.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> orterun: clean termination accomplished
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Message: 4
>>> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:55:58 -0600
>>> From: Ralph Castain <r...@lanl.gov>
>>> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ??
>>> To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org>
>>> Message-ID: <f6290ada-a196-43f0-a853-cbcb802d8...@lanl.gov>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed";
>>> DelSp="yes"
>>>
>>> The rankfile cuts across the entire job - it isn't applied on an
>>> app_context basis. So the ranks in your rankfile must correspond
>>> to
>>> the eventual rank of each process in the cmd line.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, that means you have to count ranks. In your case,
>>> you
>>> only have four, so that makes life easier. Your rankfile would
>>> look
>>> something like this:
>>>
>>> rank 0=r001n001 slot=0
>>> rank 1=r001n002 slot=1
>>> rank 2=r001n001 slot=1
>>> rank 3=r001n002 slot=2
>>>
>>> HTH
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 12:19 AM, Geoffroy Pignot wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I agree that my examples are not very clear. What I want to do
>>> is to
>>> launch a multiexes application (masters-slaves) and benefit
>>> from the
>>> processor affinity.
>>> Could you show me how to convert this command , using -rf option
>>> (whatever the affinity is)
>>>
>>> mpirun -n 1 -host r001n001 master.x options1  : -n 1 -host
>>> r001n002
>>> master.x options2 : -n 1 -host r001n001 slave.x options3 : -n 1 -
>>> host r001n002 slave.x options4
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help
>>>
>>> Geoffroy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:26:35 +0300
>>> From: Lenny Verkhovsky <lenny.verkhov...@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] 1.3.1 -rf rankfile behaviour ??
>>> To: Open MPI Users <us...@open-mpi.org>
>>> Message-ID:
>>>
>>> <453d39990904120826t2e1d1d33l7bb1fe3de65b5...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The first "crash" is OK, since your rankfile has ranks 0 and 1
>>> defined,
>>> while n=1, which means only rank 0 is present and can be
>>> allocated.
>>>
>>> NP must be >= the largest rank in rankfile.
>>>
>>> What exactly are you trying to do ?
>>>
>>> I tried to recreate your seqv but all I got was
>>>
>>> ~/work/svn/ompi/trunk/build_x86-64/install/bin/mpirun --hostfile
>>> hostfile.0
>>> -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -rf rankfile.1 -n 1 hostname
>>> [witch19:30798] mca: base: component_find: paffinity
>>> "mca_paffinity_linux"
>>> uses an MCA interface that is not recognized (component MCA
>>> v1.0.0 !=
>>> supported MCA v2.0.0) -- ignored
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> It looks like opal_init failed for some reason; your parallel
>>> process is
>>> likely to abort. There are many reasons that a parallel process
>>> can
>>> fail during opal_init; some of which are due to configuration or
>>> environment problems. This failure appears to be an internal
>>> failure;
>>> here's some additional information (which may only be relevant
>>> to an
>>> Open MPI developer):
>>>
>>> opal_carto_base_select failed
>>> --> Returned value -13 instead of OPAL_SUCCESS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [witch19:30798] [[INVALID],INVALID] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in
>>> file
>>> ../../orte/runtime/orte_init.c at line 78
>>> [witch19:30798] [[INVALID],INVALID] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Not found in
>>> file
>>> ../../orte/orted/orted_main.c at line 344
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> A daemon (pid 11629) died unexpectedly with status 243 while
>>> attempting
>>> to launch so we are aborting.
>>>
>>> There may be more information reported by the environment (see
>>> above).
>>>
>>> This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the needed
>>> shared
>>> libraries on the remote node. You may set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
>>> have the
>>> location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this
>>> will
>>> automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> mpirun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the
>>> process
>>> that caused that situation.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> mpirun: clean termination accomplished
>>>
>>>
>>> Lenny.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/10/09, Geoffroy Pignot <geopig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi ,
>>>
>>> I am currently testing the process affinity capabilities of
>>> openmpi and I
>>> would like to know if the rankfile behaviour I will describe
>>> below
>>> is normal
>>> or not ?
>>>
>>> cat hostfile.0
>>> r011n002 slots=4
>>> r011n003 slots=4
>>>
>>> cat rankfile.0
>>> rank 0=r011n002 slot=0
>>> rank 1=r011n003 slot=1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ##################################################################################
>>>
>>> mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 2  hostname ###
>>> OK
>>> r011n002
>>> r011n003
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ##################################################################################
>>> but
>>> mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -n 1
>>> hostname
>>> ### CRASHED
>>> *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Error, invalid rank (1) in the rankfile (rankfile.0)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> rmaps_rank_file.c at line 404
>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> base/rmaps_base_map_job.c at line 87
>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> base/plm_base_launch_support.c at line 77
>>> [r011n002:25129] [[63976,0],0] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Bad parameter in
>>> file
>>> plm_rsh_module.c at line 985
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> A daemon (pid unknown) died unexpectedly on signal 1  while
>>> attempting to
>>> launch so we are aborting.
>>>
>>> There may be more information reported by the environment (see
>>> above).
>>>
>>> This may be because the daemon was unable to find all the needed
>>> shared
>>> libraries on the remote node. You may set your LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>>> to
>>> have the
>>> location of the shared libraries on the remote nodes and this
>>> will
>>> automatically be forwarded to the remote nodes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> orterun noticed that the job aborted, but has no info as to the
>>> process
>>> that caused that situation.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> orterun: clean termination accomplished
>>> *
>>> It seems that the rankfile option is not propagted to the second
>>> command
>>> line ; there is no global understanding of the ranking inside a
>>> mpirun
>>> command.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ##################################################################################
>>>
>>> Assuming that , I tried to provide a rankfile to each command
>>> line:
>>>
>>> cat rankfile.0
>>> rank 0=r011n002 slot=0
>>>
>>> cat rankfile.1
>>> rank 0=r011n003 slot=1
>>>
>>> mpirun --hostfile hostfile.0 -rf rankfile.0 -n 1 hostname : -rf
>>> rankfile.1
>>> -n 1 hostname ### CRASHED
>>> *[r011n002:28778] *** Process received signal ***
>>> [r011n002:28778] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
>>> [r011n002:28778] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
>>> [r011n002:28778] Failing at address: 0x34
>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 0] [0xffffe600]
>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 1]
>>> /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/lib/libopen-rte.so.
>>> 0(orte_odls_base_default_get_add_procs_data+0x55d)
>>> [0x5557decd]
>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 2]
>>> /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/lib/libopen-rte.so.
>>> 0(orte_plm_base_launch_apps+0x117)
>>> [0x555842a7]
>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 3] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/lib/openmpi/
>>> mca_plm_rsh.so
>>> [0x556098c0]
>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 4] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/bin/orterun
>>> [0x804aa27]
>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 5] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/bin/orterun
>>> [0x804a022]
>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 6] /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)
>>> [0x9f1dec]
>>> [r011n002:28778] [ 7] /tmp/HALMPI/openmpi-1.3.1/bin/orterun
>>> [0x8049f71]
>>> [r011n002:28778] *** End of error message ***
>>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope that I've found a bug because it would be very important
>>> for me to
>>> have this kind of capabiliy .
>>> Launch a multiexe mpirun command line and be able to bind my
>>> exes
>>> and
>>> sockets together.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for your help
>>>
>>> Geoffroy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>> End of users Digest, Vol 1202, Issue 2
>>> **************************************
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>> End of users Digest, Vol 1218, Issue 2
>>> **************************************
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>> End of users Digest, Vol 1221, Issue 3
>>> **************************************
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>> End of users Digest, Vol 1221, Issue 6
>>> **************************************
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jeff Squyres
>>> Cisco Systems
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>> End of users Digest, Vol 1221, Issue 12
>>> ***************************************
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jeff Squyres
>>> Cisco Systems
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> Cisco Systems
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>

Reply via email to