On Jun 4, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Barrett, Brian W wrote: > Is indicating we don't support it really the right thing to do? Given that > SM should already have the proc data, it seems that setting the reachable bit > to zero for the other process of different "architecture" is all that is > required.
Yes, that's more specifically what I meant (I actually cited that on the ticket I just filed -- https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/2433). -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
