On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Jeremiah Willcock <jewil...@osl.iu.edu> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Jeff Squyres wrote: > >> Open MPI users -- >> >> I took a little heat at the last the MPI Forum for not having Open MPI be >> fully complaint with MPI-2.2 yet (OMPI is compliant with MPI-2.1). >> Specifically, there's still 4 open issues in Open MPI that are necessary for >> full MPI-2.2 compliance: >> >> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&summary=~MPI-2.2&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&col=version&order=priority >> >> We haven't made these items a priority because -- to be blunt -- no one >> really has been asking for them. No one has come forward and said "I *must* >> have these features!" (to be fair, they're somewhat obscure features). >> >> Other than not having the obvious "OMPI is MPI-2.2 compliant" checkmark >> for marketing reasons, is there anyone who *needs* the functionality >> represented by those still-open tickets? > > I have been writing some code that would have benefited greatly from the fix > to #2219 (MPI datatypes for C99 types and MPI integer typedefs).
+1 -- Riccardo Murri, Hadlaubstr. 150, 8006 Zürich (CH)
