On May 19, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Tom Rosmond wrote: > What fortran compiler did you use?
gfortran. > In the original script my Intel compile used the -132 option, > allowing up to that many columns per line. Gotcha. >> x.f90:99.77: >> >> call mpi_type_indexed(lenij,ijlena,ijdisp,mpi_real,ij_vector_type,ierr) >> 1 >> Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'mpi_type_indexed' at >> (1) > > Hmmm, very strange, since I am looking right at the MPI standard > documents with that routine documented. I too get this compile failure > when I switch to 'use mpi'. Could that be a problem with the Open MPI > fortran libraries??? I think that that error is telling us that there's a compile-time mismatch -- that the signature of what you've passed doesn't match the signature of OMPI's MPI_Type_indexed subroutine. >> I looked at our mpi F90 module and see the following: >> >> interface MPI_Type_indexed >> subroutine MPI_Type_indexed(count, array_of_blocklengths, >> array_of_displacements, oldtype, newtype, ierr) >> integer, intent(in) :: count >> integer, dimension(*), intent(in) :: array_of_blocklengths >> integer, dimension(*), intent(in) :: array_of_displacements >> integer, intent(in) :: oldtype >> integer, intent(out) :: newtype >> integer, intent(out) :: ierr >> end subroutine MPI_Type_indexed >> end interface Shouldn't ijlena and ijdisp be 1D arrays, not 2D arrays? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
