On Jan 31, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > In 1.5.x, cache info doesn't matter as far as I know. > > In trunk, the affinity code has been reworked. I think you can bind > process to caches there. Binding to L2 wouldn't work as expected (would > bind to one core instead of 2). hwloc doesn't have instruction cache > support so far, so wrong L1i info doesn't matter. > > I don't know if anybody in trunk uses shared cache size yet (for BTL SM > tuning for instance).
That information is all correct. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
