> Am 12.08.2016 um 16:52 schrieb r...@open-mpi.org:
>
> IIRC, the rationale behind adding the check was that someone using SGE wanted
> to specify a custom launch agent, and we were overriding it with qrsh.
> However, the check is incorrect as that MCA param cannot be NULL.
>
> I have updated this on master - can you see if this fixes the problem for you?
>
> https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/1957
I updated my tools to:
autoconf-2.69
automake-1.15
libtool-2.4.6
but I face with Open MPI's ./autogen.pl:
configure.ac:152: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
I recall seeing in already before, how to get rid of it? For now I fixed the
single source file just by hand.
-- Reuti
> As for the blank in the cmd line - that is likely due to a space reserved for
> some entry that you aren’t using (e.g., when someone manually specifies the
> prefix). It shouldn’t cause any harm as the cmd line parser is required to
> ignore spaces
>
> The -ldl problem sounds like a configuration issue - you might want to file a
> separate issue about it
>
>> On Aug 11, 2016, at 4:28 AM, Reuti <re...@staff.uni-marburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the file orte/mca/plm/rsh/plm_rsh_component I see an if-statement, which
>> seems to prevent the tight integration with SGE to start:
>>
>> if (NULL == mca_plm_rsh_component.agent) {
>>
>> Why is it there (it wasn't in 1.10.3)?
>>
>> If I just remove it I get:
>>
>> [node17:25001] [[27678,0],0] plm:rsh: final template argv:
>> qrsh <template> orted --hnp-topo-sig ...
>>
>> instead of the former:
>>
>> /usr/sge/bin/lx24-amd64/qrsh -inherit -nostdin -V -verbose <template> orted
>> --hnp-topo-sig ...
>>
>> So, just removing the if-statement is not a perfect cure as the
>> $SGE_ROOT/$ARC does not prefix `qrsh`.
>>
>> ==
>>
>> BTW: why is there blank before " orted" in the assembled command line - and
>> it's really in the argument when I check this on the slave nodes what should
>> be started by the `qrsh_starter`? As long as there is a wrapping shell, it
>> will be removed anyway. But in a special setup we noticed this additional
>> blank.
>>
>> ==
>>
>> I also notice, that I have to supply "-ldl" to `mpicc` to allow the
>> compilation of an application to succeed in 2.0.0.
>>
>> -- Reuti
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> users@lists.open-mpi.org
>> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/users
