Hi Ben, Am 05.12.2011 um 15:58 schrieb Ben Walton: > Excerpts from Mark R Bannister's message of Mon Dec 05 09:53:29 -0500 2011: >> I thought your package would help Dago, but you don't have any argp >> symbols in libgnu.a, even though you have prototypes for them in >> argp.h. > > ...snip... > >> So it'd be nice to include the functions in the library if you're >> going to put the prototypes in the header file. > > This could simply be an artifact of the gnulib dependency system. > It's entirely possible that one of the modules that is compiled in had > a header-only dependency on argp.h and thus the file gets imported. > If nothing required argp.c and it wasn't explicitly imported, a > header-only version could end up in libgnu_dev. > > This can be fixed by explicitly requesting that module from gnulib.
Correct, the gnulib.a I built was for the ./posix-modules which does not include argp. I am not sure how to proceed from here, should the package aim for posix-compliance or just include what it has got to offer? Or do we want "dynamic" GAR support where you just specifiy what you want and GAR makes a static lib in one go and provides linker flags for that? Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
