I'm willing to help interested parties get up to speed with the python rebuilding effort...it mostly just needs a lot of package rebuilding currently...but I'm short on time to complete the project myself right now. There is a project page tracking my work so you could just pick up where I left off.
Moving to 2.7 would be good but requires somewhat more initial effort. Given the issues Maciej had and my time availability, I opted to just made 2.6 healthier. Thanks -Ben On Jan 8, 2013 1:46 PM, "Reaves, Timothy E" <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > Thats too bad; 2.7 introduced a few needed features, but, some of the > libraries out there do not support 3.3 yet, so I can't migrate. 2.7 > compiles just fine for me, but my organization wants a package, so I'll > just need to make the package for the installer. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] on > behalf of Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski > Sent: Mon 1/7/2013 6:40 PM > To: Questions and discussions > Subject: Re: [csw-users] Python 2.7 > > 2013/1/7 Reaves, Timothy E <[email protected]>: > > I see where work for 2.7 support was done as far back as late 2011, but, > I > > see no actual release for it. Anyone have any ideas when one will be > made? > > I don't think there will be a 2.7 release. We'll probably skip all the > intermediate versions and go straight to 3.3. I released the first > version into unstable today. > > I'll be also looking into building a 64-bit version, but all my > previous attempts failed[1]. > > Maciej > > [1] http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/2010-April/011834.html > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/users
