Hi, actually, Jeff is right. Ubuntu has its own rules about where should the files go, that's why the OpenNebula 1.4 Ubuntu package is in system-wide mode. The reason why we changed to self-contained for 2.0 is simply because since we are doing the packaging ourselves, it was easier to do it in the self-contained mode.
Nevertheless we are going to follow Jeff's advice and for the next beta releases and the final release we will create the Ubuntu package in system-wide mode. cheers, Jaime On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Jeff Williams <je...@wherethebitsroam.com>wrote: > I would guess because the ubuntu packaging standards have rules about where > everything should be put. This way, someone familiar with Ubuntu will know > where to find things and bin files will be in their path etc. > > The 2.0 beta ubuntu package is in the self-contained mode and I would have > much preferred the system wide! > > Jeff > > > On 12/08/2010, at 4:27 PM, Tobias Weikard wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've got a small question. In the documentation from OpenNebula 1.4 ( > http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel1.4:plan) is described, that the > preferred installation mode is the self-contained mode. > > > > But the Ubunutu binary packaged available at > http://downloads.dsa-research.org/opennebula/ubuntu-one-1.4.0 is packaged > in the system-wide mode. Why isn't it provided in the self-contained mode? > Is there any reason? > > > > Thanks, > > Tobias > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > Users@lists.opennebula.org > > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opennebula.org > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org