Hi, OpenNebula names the VMs, meaning the hypervisor instances, as one-<id>. You will probably have collisions.
You can use this workaround: modify the pool_control table in the DB and set the last_oid for VMs to 1000 in one of the two front-ends. That will make one OpenNebula create VMs starting with one-1001, one-1002... Regards. -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open Source Toolkit for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula<http://twitter.com/opennebula><cmar...@opennebula.org> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Humberto N. Castejon Martinez < humca...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I know that sharing a worker node between two front-ends (i.e. having a > worker as part of two clouds) sounds strange, and I am not thinking on > doing it for production. I am just performing some experiments and would > like to use the same worker from different front-ends. Provided that I use > different VM_DIR and SCRIPTS_REMOTE_DIR for each front-end, would I > experiment any problem. > > Cheers, > Humberto > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opennebula.org > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org