Hi, Datastores were introduced in 3.4. Unless there is a good reason not to, I'd suggest you to upgrade to the latest 3.6 version.
Regards -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center Virtualization www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | @OpenNebula<http://twitter.com/opennebula><cmar...@opennebula.org> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Duverne, Cyrille < cyrille.duve...@euranova.eu> wrote: > Hello Carlos, > > As you might have read it, i'm using ONE 3.2 packaged in Ubuntu 12.04. > onedatastore show isn't a supported command of this version... Or at least > I get a "command not found" > > How could I retrieve this info from ? > > Regards > CyD > > Thanks in advance. > Cyrille > > Cyrille Duverne > Blog : http://blog.cduverne.com > Twitter : @CydsWorld > > "Imagination is more important than Knowledge" > Albert Einstein > > > > Mercredi 05/09/2012 à 12:34 Carlos Martín Sánchez a écrit: > > Hi, > > What I need to know are the DS_MAD and TM_MAD datastore drivers for the > system Datastore 0, and the Datastore where the images are registered (I > guess 'default', 1). You can get them using the 'onedatastore show' command. > > Regards > -- > Carlos Martín, MSc > Project Engineer > OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center Virtualization > www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | > @OpenNebula<http://twitter.com/opennebula><cmar...@opennebula.org> > > > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Duverne, Cyrille < > cyrille.duve...@euranova.eu> wrote: > >> Hello Carlos, >> >> Thanks for your quick answer. >> >> I'm using KVM and my images are only clones... >> >> Regards >> Cyrille >> >> Mardi 04/09/2012 à 15:14 Carlos Martín Sánchez a écrit: >> >> Hi, >> >> I can't reproduce this behaviour. >> I'm using the drivers -,shared for the system datastore; and fs,shared >> for the default datastore. What drivers are you using? Are your images >> persistent? >> >> About the CLI-Sunstone commands consistency, both end calling the ruby >> OCA and then the core, so they should always have the same outcome. >> >> Regards >> -- >> Carlos Martín, MSc >> Project Engineer >> OpenNebula - The Open-source Solution for Data Center Virtualization >> www.OpenNebula.org | cmar...@opennebula.org | >> @OpenNebula<http://twitter.com/opennebula><cmar...@opennebula.org> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Duverne, Cyrille < >> cyrille.duve...@euranova.eu> wrote: >> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> I've faced a strange behaviour with Sunstone. >>> >>> 1/ I created a VM using Sunstone >>> 2/ I modified the VM to be consistent with my new config >>> 3/ I launched a "onevm saveas" directly from the Hypervisor >>> 4/ I chmoded the image dor my current user >>> 5/ The new image was ready after a shutdown of the VM >>> 6/ I created a new VM using this new image >>> 7/ modified it again >>> 8/ Launched a "onevm saveas" with the same image name and the command >>> passed >>> 9/ I found 2 images with the same name (different ownership) >>> 10/ The 2nd image has never been ready. >>> 11/ I removed the most recent image >>> 12/ The remaining image is compromised and can't be found on the disk >>> because pointing to a file that has been deleted in the process. >>> >>> I know that a saveas command is available on sunstone but I'd like to >>> test the consistence between actions done via oneadmin in the CLI and on >>> Sunstone. >>> >>> Have you ever experienced this ? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> Users@lists.opennebula.org >>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org