This is great news!!! Thanks for the information!! Will help the selling point on my side.
Michael Curran | connectsolutions | Lead Network Architect Phone 614.568.2285 | Mobile 614.403.6320 | www.connectsolutions.com -----Original Message----- From: Tino Vazquez [mailto:cvazq...@c12g.com] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 7:38 AM To: Michael Curran Cc: users@lists.opennebula.org Subject: Re: [one-users] Datastore questions Hi Michael, That is a very good question indeed ;) In fact, we had that feature (multiple system datastores [1]) scheduled for 4.2 (Flame), but we want to test it more thoroughly, so we delayed it for 4.4. Best, -Tino [1] http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/1712 -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents, unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged, and is intended solely for the person and/or entity to whom it is addressed (i.e. those identified in the "To" and "cc" box). They are the property of C12G Labs S.L.. Unauthorized distribution, review, use, disclosure, or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@c12g.com and delete the e-mail and attachments and any copy from your system. C12G thanks you for your cooperation. On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Michael Curran <michael.cur...@connectsolutions.com> wrote: > Hello - > > > > This is a generalized question about the system datastore and the > images datastore > > > > In OpenNebula - you store all your running VM's in the system > datastore , and images in the aptly named images datastore. I am > using it on top of VMware, with SAN attached storage. In my test > environment for this it is not an issue, there will never be more > environments than I have room for in my system datastore > > > > Now the tricky part of this question - my current production > environment is made up of anywhere from 4 - 10 ESXi hosts in a VMware > cluster (depending on > location) and I have no less than 30 LUNS attached as Datastores for > vmware - since it can see and use each of them individually on all > nodes in the cluster > > > > When the time comes to stand up my production Opennebula I will be > building it on top of the existing environment, but I will not be > destroying any current VM's - especially since VMware created VM's and > OpenNebula created VM's can co-exist on the same set of infrastructure > > > > Why has ON been limited to 1 system Datastore? Why can't it take > advantage of whatever storage is attached to the ESXi hosts and I > choose the DS it goes onto. Presently the way its built, I would have > to stand up one ON server per DS for VM's and share the same images DS > - that seems a bit cumbersome to manage and also a waste of resources. > Also if you outgrow your system datastore, you can just grow it once > created at a HW raid level - it has to be destroyed to be expanded - I > should just be able to add storage and take advantage of the extra datastores > for adding new VM's to run on. > > > > Am I just reading the documentation wrong? > > > > Michael Curran | connectsolutions | Lead Network Architect > > Phone 614.568.2285 | Mobile 614.403.6320 | www.connectsolutions.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opennebula.org > http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
