Hi Carlos,

Sorry for the delay in answering you.

Thanks you very much for letting us know and for checking it.

Cheers,
Esteban

On 09/07/14 16:11, Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote:
Hi guys,

The problem was in the fsck tool.
If you need to, you can download the fixed version from here:
https://github.com/OpenNebula/one/blob/one-4.6/src/onedb/fsck.rb

Thank you for reporting it.
--
Carlos Martín, MSc
Project Engineer
OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
www.OpenNebula.org <http://www.OpenNebula.org> | cmar...@opennebula.org <mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org> | @OpenNebula <http://twitter.com/opennebula>


On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Esteban Freire <esfre...@cesga.es <mailto:esfre...@cesga.es>> wrote:

    Hi Carlos, Boris,

    Carlos, thanks a lot for opening a ticket about it.

    About the nokogiri gem version, it is the following one:

    [oneadmin@cloud ~]$ gem list | grep nokogiri
    nokogiri (1.5.10)

    Yes, as Boris said, this is the only broken pool for us.

    Please, let me know if you need anything else.

    Thanks,
    Esteban


    On 30/06/14 10:59, Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote:
    Hi,

    On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Boris Parak <256...@mail.muni.cz
    <mailto:256...@mail.muni.cz>> wrote:

        Hi Javi, Esteban,

        this issue might be related to the upgrade process from 4.4
        (or 4.2)
        to 4.6, I wasn't able to reproduce it in clean 4.6 installations.

        Cheers, Boris


    I just opened a ticket to solve this:
    http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/3014

    Boris, Esteban: Can you please tell me your nokogiri gem version?

    Also, Esteban said this only happened for the group pool. Was
    this the only broken pool for you too, Boris?

    Thanks,
    Carlos
    --
    Carlos Martín, MSc
    Project Engineer
    OpenNebula - Flexible Enterprise Cloud Made Simple
    www.OpenNebula.org <http://www.opennebula.org/> |
    cmar...@opennebula.org <mailto:cmar...@opennebula.org> |
    @OpenNebula <http://twitter.com/opennebula>

        On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Esteban Freire
        <esfre...@cesga.es <mailto:esfre...@cesga.es>> wrote:
        > Hi Javi,
        >
        > No, we only have found this issue with  onegroup list --xml
        command, other
        > pools seem to be OK . Boris Parak from CESNET (in CC) also
        have found the
        > same issue.
        >
        > I send you the required output :
        >
        > [oneadmin@cloud ~]$ ruby --version
        > ruby 1.9.3p545 (2014-02-24 revision 45159) [x86_64-linux]
        >
        > [oneadmin@cloud ~]$ gem list
        >
        > *** LOCAL GEMS ***
        >
        > activesupport (3.2.14)
        > amazon-ec2 (0.9.17)
        > antlr3 (1.9.2)
        > aws-sdk (1.15.0)
        > backports (3.3.3)
        > bigdecimal (1.1.0)
        > builder (3.2.2)
        > bundler (1.6.3, 1.5.3)
        > bundler-unload (1.0.2)
        > curb (0.8.5)
        > daemon_controller (1.1.5)
        > daemons (1.1.9)
        > diff-lcs (1.2.4)
        > erubis (2.7.0)
        > eventmachine (1.0.3)
        > executable-hooks (1.3.1)
        > gem-wrappers (1.2.4)
        > hashie (1.2.0)
        > highline (1.6.19)
        > httparty (0.11.0)
        > i18n (0.6.5)
        > io-console (0.3)
        > json (1.8.0, 1.5.5)
        > memcache-client (1.8.5)
        > minitest (2.5.1)
        > multi_json (1.7.9)
        > multi_xml (0.5.5)
        > mysql (2.9.1)
        > net-ldap (0.6.0)
        > nokogiri (1.5.10)
        > oca (3.4.1)
        > occi (2.5.19)
        > ox (2.1.1)
        > parse-cron (0.1.4)
        > passenger (4.0.13)
        > polyglot (0.3.4)
        > rack (1.5.2)
        > rack-protection (1.5.0)
        > rack-test (0.6.2)
        > rake (10.1.0, 0.9.2.2)
        > rdoc (3.9.5)
        > rspec (2.14.1)
        > rspec-core (2.14.5)
        > rspec-expectations (2.14.2)
        > rspec-http (0.10.0)
        > rspec-mocks (2.14.3)
        > rubygems-bundler (1.4.2)
        > rvm (1.11.3.9)
        > sequel (4.9.0)
        > simplecov (0.7.1)
        > simplecov-html (0.7.1)
        > sinatra (1.3.6)
        > sinatra-contrib (1.3.2)
        > sinatra-cross_origin (0.2.0)
        > sqlite3 (1.3.9)
        > thin (1.6.2)
        > tilt (1.4.1)
        > treetop (1.5.3)
        > trollop (2.0)
        > uuidtools (2.1.4)
        > xml-simple (1.1.2)
        > xmlparser (0.7.2.1)
        > yard (0.8.7)
        > yard-sinatra (1.0.0)
        > [oneadmin@cloud ~]$
        >
        > Thanks in advance,
        > Esteban
        >
        >
        > On 06/26/2014 12:41 PM, Javier Fontan wrote:
        >>
        >> I am not able to reproduce it. Does it also happen with
        other pools
        >> like VMs or images?
        >>
        >> We need the output of these commands to investigate further:
        >>
        >> $ ruby --version
        >> $ gem list
        >>
        >> Cheers
        >>
        >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Esteban Freire
        <esfre...@cesga.es <mailto:esfre...@cesga.es>>
        >> wrote:
        >>>
        >>> Hi all,
        >>>
        >>> Probably, this is already a known bug, but in any case, I
        would like to
        >>> let
        >>> you know that onegroup list --xml is not showing a valid
        XML document
        >>> after
        >>> upgrading to 4.6.* from previous versions:
        >>>
        >>> If you take a look to the output for onegroup list --xml
        command, it
        >>> appears
        >>> the following:
        >>>
        >>> <GROUP_POOL><?xml version="1.0"?>
        >>>
        >>> As you can see, it would have to be:
        >>>
        >>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
        >>> <GROUP_POOL>
        >>>
        >>> Also, there are other "<?xml version="1.0"?>" in the
        output which break
        >>> its
        >>> functionality.
        >>>
        >>> For now, we are executing the following workaround to get
        a valid XML
        >>> document:
        >>>
        >>> onegroup list --xml | sed 's/<?xml version="1.0"?>//'
        >>>
        >>> Do you know when it could be solved? I know it is not a
        critical bug but
        >>> it
        >>> would be great if someone could take a look on it.
        >>>
        >>> Thanks in advance,
        >>> Esteban
        >>>
        >>> _______________________________________________
        >>> Users mailing list
        >>> Users@lists.opennebula.org
        <mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org>
        >>> http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
        >>
        >>
        >>
        >
        >
        > --
        > ++-------------------------++
        > Esteban Freire García
        > Centro de supercomputación de Galicia
        > Avda. de Vigo s/n. Campus Vida
        > 15705 - Santiago de Compostela. Spain
        > Tlfn.: 981 56 98 10 Extension:274
        > Fax: 981 59 46 16
        >
        _______________________________________________
        Users mailing list
        Users@lists.opennebula.org <mailto:Users@lists.opennebula.org>
        http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org




-- ++-------------------------++
    Esteban Freire García
    Centro de supercomputación de Galicia
    Avda. de Vigo s/n. Campus Vida
    15705 - Santiago de Compostela. Spain
    Tlfn.: 981 56 98 10 Extension:274
    Fax: 981 59 46 16




--
++-------------------------++
Esteban Freire García
Centro de supercomputación de Galicia
Avda. de Vigo s/n. Campus Vida
15705 - Santiago de Compostela. Spain
Tlfn.: 981 56 98 10 Extension:274
Fax: 981 59 46 16

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Reply via email to